[R] building R on freebsd 6.2 (amd64)

2007-01-18 Thread Hiroyuki Kawakatsu
Hi, I updated my os to freebsd 6.2 and built R-patched with no changes in configure. I pass make check and copy the R executable to /usr/local/bin/R. Then when I start R, I get /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libRblas.so not found, required by R and have to copy/link the two shared object

Re: [R] building R on freebsd 6.2 (amd64)

2007-01-18 Thread Gordon Bergling
Hi, Hiroyuki Kawakatsu wrote: Hi, I updated my os to freebsd 6.2 and built R-patched with no changes in configure. I pass make check and copy the R executable to /usr/local/bin/R. Then when I start R, I get /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libRblas.so not found, required by R and have

Re: [R] building R on freebsd 6.2 (amd64)

2007-01-18 Thread Prof Brian D Ripley
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, Hiroyuki Kawakatsu wrote: Hi, I updated my os to freebsd 6.2 and built R-patched with no changes in configure. I pass make check and copy the R executable to /usr/local/bin/R. Then when I start R, I get /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libRblas.so not found,

Re: [R] building R on freebsd 6.2 (amd64)

2007-01-18 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, Hiroyuki Kawakatsu wrote: On 1/18/07, Prof Brian D Ripley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The R front end sets LD_LIBRARY_PATH to include the place it puts libR.so. It looks like that is not effective on your machine, but you will have to investigate for us why. I am pretty

Re: [R] building R on freebsd 6.2 (amd64)

2007-01-18 Thread Hiroyuki Kawakatsu
On 1/18/07, Prof Brian D Ripley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The R front end sets LD_LIBRARY_PATH to include the place it puts libR.so. It looks like that is not effective on your machine, but you will have to investigate for us why. I am pretty sure other FreeBSD users (6.2 and 7) on AMD64