Re: [R] make error R-5.1 on sun solaris

2007-07-13 Thread Dan Powers
]; 'R-Help' Subject: Re: [R] make error R-5.1 on sun solaris You are asked for a C99 compiler and configure normally finds one: mixing declarations and code is valid C99. Unless something has been done with environment variables (e.g. in config.site) this gcc is very old. configure shou

Re: [R] make error R-5.1 on sun solaris

2007-07-11 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
You are asked for a C99 compiler and configure normally finds one: mixing declarations and code is valid C99. Unless something has been done with environment variables (e.g. in config.site) this gcc is very old. configure should come up with 'gcc -std=gnu99'. Re-ordering the code will help (b

Re: [R] make error R-5.1 on sun solaris

2007-07-11 Thread Peter Dalgaard
Dan Powers wrote: > I hope this is enough information to determine the problem. Thanks in > advance for any help. > > Configure goes ok (I think) > > ./configure --prefix=$HOME --without-iconv > > > R is now configured for sparc-sun-solaris2.9 > > Source directory: . > Installation dir

[R] make error R-5.1 on sun solaris

2007-07-11 Thread Dan Powers
I hope this is enough information to determine the problem. Thanks in advance for any help. Configure goes ok (I think) ./configure --prefix=$HOME --without-iconv R is now configured for sparc-sun-solaris2.9 Source directory: . Installation directory:/home/dpowers C compile

Re: [R] make sample() faster

2007-06-14 Thread Rainer M. Krug
Thanks for the info - so the solution would (likely) be to draw several samples and use these whenever I need a new one. tHANKS, i'LL TRY IT OUT, rAINER P.S: somebody said once that the caps-lock key is the most useless key on the keyboard and he is right... Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > I thin

Re: [R] make sample() faster

2007-06-14 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
I think the problem is not sample (which is written in C), but that you are calling it with size=1. Taking one sample with probabilities from a large discrete distribution is necessarily slow, but you can take a large sample for little more cost. On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Rainer M. Krug wrote: > H

[R] make sample() faster

2007-06-14 Thread Rainer M. Krug
Hi I have a simulation which is relatively slow. I used Rprofile() and identified the calls to sample() as the culprit is sample(): > summaryRprof("Documents/PostDoc/Aloe_Pillansii/R/create.out") $by.self self.time self.pct total.time total.pct "sample" 1.30

Re: [R] Make check failure for R-2.4.1

2007-05-25 Thread Adam Witney
> Adam> Here is the results: > >>> xB <- c(2000,1e6,1e50,Inf) >>> for(df in c(0.1, 1, 10)) > Adam> +for(ncp in c(0, 1, 10, 100)) > Adam> +print(pchisq(xB, df=df, ncp=ncp), digits == 15) > Adam> Error in print.default(pchisq(xB, df = df, ncp = ncp), digits ==

Re: [R] Make check failure for R-2.4.1

2007-05-25 Thread Martin Maechler
> "Adam" == Adam Witney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > on Fri, 25 May 2007 14:48:18 +0100 writes: >>> ##-- non central Chi^2 : >>> xB <- c(2000,1e6,1e50,Inf) >>> for(df in c(0.1, 1, 10)) >> + for(ncp in c(0, 1, 10, 100)) stopifnot(pchisq(xB, df=df, ncp=ncp) ==1) >> Erro

Re: [R] Make check failure for R-2.4.1

2007-05-25 Thread Adam Witney
>> ##-- non central Chi^2 : >> xB <- c(2000,1e6,1e50,Inf) >> for(df in c(0.1, 1, 10)) > + for(ncp in c(0, 1, 10, 100)) stopifnot(pchisq(xB, df=df, ncp=ncp) ==1) > Error: pchisq(xB, df = df, ncp = ncp) == 1 is not all TRUE > Execution halted > > Ok, thanks; > so, if we want to learn mo

Re: [R] Make check failure for R-2.4.1

2007-05-25 Thread Martin Maechler
> "Adam" == Adam Witney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > on Fri, 25 May 2007 09:38:29 +0100 writes: Adam> Thanks for your replies Details inline below: Adam> On 24/5/07 17:12, "Martin Maechler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> "UweL" == Uwe Ligges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

Re: [R] Make check failure for R-2.4.1

2007-05-25 Thread Adam Witney
Thanks for your replies Details inline below: On 24/5/07 17:12, "Martin Maechler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> "UweL" == Uwe Ligges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> on Thu, 24 May 2007 17:34:16 +0200 writes: > > UweL> Some of these test are expected from time to time, since they are

Re: [R] Make check failure for R-2.4.1

2007-05-24 Thread Martin Maechler
> "UweL" == Uwe Ligges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > on Thu, 24 May 2007 17:34:16 +0200 writes: UweL> Some of these test are expected from time to time, since they are using UweL> random numbers. Just re-run. eehm, "some of these", yes, but not the ones Adam mentioned, d-p-q-r-test

Re: [R] Make check failure for R-2.4.1

2007-05-24 Thread Uwe Ligges
Some of these test are expected from time to time, since they are using random numbers. Just re-run. BTW: We do have R-2.5.0 these days. Uwe Ligges Adam Witney wrote: > I'm trying to install R-2.4.1, everything configure's and make's OK, but the > make check fails: > > running code in 'd-p-q-

[R] Make check failure for R-2.4.1

2007-05-24 Thread Adam Witney
I'm trying to install R-2.4.1, everything configure's and make's OK, but the make check fails: running code in 'd-p-q-r-tests.R' ...make[3]: *** [d-p-q-r-tests.Rout] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/install/R-2.4.1/tests' make[2]: *** [test-Specific] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directo

Re: [R] make check prob with internet

2007-05-24 Thread Uwe Ligges
Erin Hodgess wrote: > Dear R People: > > There seem to be some problems with the make check still. > > I changed the TMPDIR to C:\Temp, and that helped a great deal. > > But I'm still having problems with the internet.r functions. > > Please see below: > C:\esr\R-2.5.0\src\gnuwin32>make check

[R] make check prob with internet

2007-05-23 Thread Erin Hodgess
Dear R People: There seem to be some problems with the make check still. I changed the TMPDIR to C:\Temp, and that helped a great deal. But I'm still having problems with the internet.r functions. Please see below: C:\esr\R-2.5.0\src\gnuwin32>make check make check Testing package base

[R] make check error in linux OS

2007-05-23 Thread Bricklemyer, Ross S
I am rebuilding R in a Mandriva Linux environment and have hit a new stumbling point I get the following error. Any help would be greatly appreciated. " make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/R_HOME/R-2.5.0/tests' make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/local/R_HOME/R-2.5.0/tests' make[3]: Entering di

Re: [R] make check problem

2007-05-23 Thread Sicotte, Hugues Ph.D.
, 2007 2:11 PM To: r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch Subject: [R] make check problem Dear R People: I thought all was well with my source compilation on Windows until I tried "make check" Here is an abbreviated version of my results: C:\esr\R-2.5.0\src\gnuwin32>make check make check ---

Re: [R] make check problem

2007-05-23 Thread Peter Dalgaard
Erin Hodgess wrote: > Dear R People: > > I thought all was well with my source compilation on Windows > until I tried "make check" > > Here is an abbreviated version of my results: > > C:\esr\R-2.5.0\src\gnuwin32>make check > make check > Testing package base > Running examples in

[R] make check problem

2007-05-23 Thread Erin Hodgess
Dear R People: I thought all was well with my source compilation on Windows until I tried "make check" Here is an abbreviated version of my results: C:\esr\R-2.5.0\src\gnuwin32>make check make check Testing package base Running examples in 'base-Ex.R' ... Comparing `base-Ex.Rou

[R] make check fails tools-Ex in 2.5.0

2007-05-23 Thread Pacey, Mike
Hi folks, I'm attempting to compile and install 2.5.0, and "make check" is failing one of the earlier sanity tests. I'll append the relevant portion of the Rout.fail file below, but I've narrowed it down manually to a single command: > sessionInfo() R version 2.5.0 (2007-04-23) x86_64-unknown-l

Re: [R] Make sign test show test statistics

2007-05-14 Thread S Ellison
Johan, Tests return objects of class "htest"; see ?t.test for a description. binom.test(59,100)$statistic confirms that Ted harding is right about the test statistic; it's just the number of successes. Steve Ellison >>> "Johan A. Stenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 14/05/2007 11:07:53 >>> When I per

Re: [R] Make sign test show test statistics

2007-05-14 Thread Ted Harding
On 14-May-07 10:07:53, Johan A. Stenberg wrote: > When I perform a two-tailed sign test with the following simple syntax, > > binom.test(59,100) > > R returns a P-value (0.088) but nothing else. As I want the result for > a > one-tailed test I take P/2 = 0.044). 1: If you want a 1-sided P-value

[R] Make sign test show test statistics

2007-05-14 Thread Johan A. Stenberg
When I perform a two-tailed sign test with the following simple syntax, binom.test(59,100) R returns a P-value (0.088) but nothing else. As I want the result for a one-tailed test I take P/2 = 0.044). However, the journal to which I've submitted my results requests the test statistics, not just

Re: [R] make check failure, internet.Rout.fail, Error in strsplit

2007-02-13 Thread Paul Lynch
I just happen to also have a MacOS 10.4 machine, but when I tried from there, I still got "Content-length". Anyway, I am fairly certain that headers received from web servers would not be modified by the receiving machine or anything in-between. I suspect that the machine at www.stats.ox.ac.uk, e

Re: [R] make check failure, internet.Rout.fail, Error in strsplit

2007-02-13 Thread Paul Lynch
Thanks for giving it a try. It is very odd that you got "Content-Length" when I am getting "Content-length". I just tried curl (I had been using telnet to port 80) and I got the same (error causing) "length" result: > curl --head http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/datasets/csb/ch11b.dat HTTP/1.1 200

Re: [R] make check failure, internet.Rout.fail, Error in strsplit

2007-02-12 Thread Charilaos Skiadas
On Feb 12, 2007, at 6:28 PM, Paul Lynch wrote: > I'm trying to build R on RedHat EL4. The compile went fine, but a > make check ran into a problem and produced a file > "internet.Rout.fail". Judging by the last part of that file, it was > trying to run an R routine called "httpget" to retrieve t

[R] make check failure, internet.Rout.fail, Error in strsplit

2007-02-12 Thread Paul Lynch
I'm trying to build R on RedHat EL4. The compile went fine, but a make check ran into a problem and produced a file "internet.Rout.fail". Judging by the last part of that file, it was trying to run an R routine called "httpget" to retrieve the URL http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/datasets/csb/ch11b.

Re: [R] Make error for R-devel package under linux

2007-02-02 Thread Xinxia Peng
t: Re: [R] Make error for R-devel package under linux It is Feb 2 today: this was fixed 60 hours ago. In any case, R-help is not the list to discuss any aspect of R version 2.5.0 Under development (unstable) (2007-02-01 r40632) which cannot be expect

Re: [R] Make error for R-devel package under linux

2007-02-02 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
It is Feb 2 today: this was fixed 60 hours ago. In any case, R-help is not the list to discuss any aspect of R version 2.5.0 Under development (unstable) (2007-02-01 r40632) which cannot be expected to build in all locales and architectures at all ti

[R] Make error for R-devel package under linux

2007-02-02 Thread Xinxia Peng
Hi, I got an error while compiling the R-devel (R-2.5.0) package under Redhat Linux, but the R-patch package (R-2.4.1) was compiled perfectly fine. The following is what I got from the R-devel package downloaed on Jan. 30th., 2007: --- >./c

Re: [R] Make many barplot into one plot

2006-12-04 Thread Muhammad Subianto
Dear; Marc Schwartz and Deepayan Sarkar, Thank you both very much for the suggestions! These are exactly what I was looking for. Best wishes, Muhammad Subianto On this day 12/01/2006 09:09 PM, Deepayan Sarkar wrote: > On 12/1/06, Marc Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Fri, 2006-12-01 a

Re: [R] Make many barplot into one plot

2006-12-01 Thread Deepayan Sarkar
On 12/1/06, Marc Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 18:02 +0100, Muhammad Subianto wrote: > > Dear all, > > ## I have 4 tables like this: > > > > satu <- array(c(5,15,20,68,29,54,84,119), dim=c(2,4), > >dimnames=list(c("Negative", "Positive"), c("Black", >

Re: [R] Make many barplot into one plot

2006-12-01 Thread Marc Schwartz
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 18:02 +0100, Muhammad Subianto wrote: > Dear all, > ## I have 4 tables like this: > > satu <- array(c(5,15,20,68,29,54,84,119), dim=c(2,4), >dimnames=list(c("Negative", "Positive"), c("Black", > "Brown", "Red", "Blond"))) > dua <- array(c(50,105,30,8,29,25

[R] Make many barplot into one plot

2006-12-01 Thread Muhammad Subianto
Dear all, ## I have 4 tables like this: satu <- array(c(5,15,20,68,29,54,84,119), dim=c(2,4), dimnames=list(c("Negative", "Positive"), c("Black", "Brown", "Red", "Blond"))) dua <- array(c(50,105,30,8,29,25,84,9), dim=c(2,4), dimnames=list(c("Negative", "Positive")

Re: [R] make missing on Solaris (was no subject)

2006-09-18 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
reported: > > make: not found It is in /usr/ccs/bin, and not usually in the Parh on Solaris. BUT, your R is very old (2.2.0, and 2.4.0 is about to go into beta). Please update as we ask (see the posting guide) *before* posting about problems. > without a functioning "make" com

Re: [R] make check errors for R-2.3.1

2006-06-09 Thread Paul Roebuck
On Thu, 8 Jun 2006, Luo Weijun wrote: > I tried to build R-2.3.1 from source under Mac OS X > 10.4.6. (I am doing so because only this way I can get > the 64-bit version of R) > > The configure and make steps look fine. But I got > errors when I did make check-all, here is the message: > > running

[R] make check errors for R-2.3.1

2006-06-08 Thread Luo Weijun
Hello all, I tried to build R-2.3.1 from source under Mac OS X 10.4.6. (I am doing so because only this way I can get the 64-bit version of R) The configure and make steps look fine. But I got errors when I did make check-all, here is the message: running code in 'base-Ex.R' ...make[4]: *** [base

[R] "make check" errors when checking R1.9.1 build (was RE: Building V2.3.0 on Tru64 V5.1B)

2006-06-02 Thread Ravi, Narendra, INFOT
Hi, I am attempting to build R on Alpha servers running Tru64 UNIX. I am having problems building R 2.3.0 so am attempting to build older releases. I have been able to build R 1.9.1 without problem. However "make check" fails for the following tests: 1. arith.Rout The difference

Re: [R] make error for R-2.3.0

2006-05-19 Thread Peter Dalgaard
"Marc Schwartz (via MN)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Download the latest r-patched tarball and you should be OK. Prof. > Ripley made some changes to sock.h that should get around these issues. > Unfortunately, they were not reported until after the release of 2.3.0. > > Download from here: >

Re: [R] make error for R-2.3.0

2006-05-19 Thread Randall C Johnson [Contr.]
That's exactly what I needed. thanks to all! Randy On 5/19/06 4:02 PM, "Marc Schwartz (via MN)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2006-05-19 at 15:37 -0400, Randall C Johnson [Contr.] wrote: >> Hello, >> I'm trying to install R on a linux machine running Red Hat 8. I ran >> >> ./configure >

Re: [R] make error for R-2.3.0

2006-05-19 Thread Marc Schwartz (via MN)
On Fri, 2006-05-19 at 15:37 -0400, Randall C Johnson [Contr.] wrote: > Hello, > I'm trying to install R on a linux machine running Red Hat 8. I ran > > ./configure > make > > and get the following error. I've installed several versions of R (2.2.1 > most recently) on this machine and haven't had

[R] make error for R-2.3.0

2006-05-19 Thread Randall C Johnson [Contr.]
Hello, I'm trying to install R on a linux machine running Red Hat 8. I ran ./configure make and get the following error. I've installed several versions of R (2.2.1 most recently) on this machine and haven't had any problems until now. I wondered if the outdated compiler (gcc version 3.2) was the

[R] make: Target `all' not remade because of errors.

2006-02-09 Thread J Cad
Hi: I don't know if it is a bug or what? I followed instructions. Jean R version: R-2.2.1 OS: Linux RedHat 9 I followed the instructions. tar -xvf, configure, then make. I get these error messages at the end of make and with make check.

Re: [R] make check failed on linux-amd64 using PGI compilers

2005-11-11 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Liaw, Andy wrote: >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> "Liaw, Andy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> Dear R-help, >>> >>> I am trying to build R-2.2.0-patched (2005-11-07 r36217) on >> the head node of >>> a Scyld cluster (dual Opteron 250s) using PGI compilers >> (v6.0). I use

Re: [R] make check failed on linux-amd64 using PGI compilers

2005-11-10 Thread Liaw, Andy
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "Liaw, Andy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Dear R-help, > > > > I am trying to build R-2.2.0-patched (2005-11-07 r36217) on > the head node of > > a Scyld cluster (dual Opteron 250s) using PGI compilers > (v6.0). I used the > > flags suggested by Jennifer Lai

Re: [R] make check failed on linux-amd64 using PGI compilers

2005-11-10 Thread Peter Dalgaard
"Liaw, Andy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Dear R-help, > > I am trying to build R-2.2.0-patched (2005-11-07 r36217) on the head node of > a Scyld cluster (dual Opteron 250s) using PGI compilers (v6.0). I used the > flags suggested by Jennifer Lai on R-devel (taken from R-admin, except that > I

[R] make check failed on linux-amd64 using PGI compilers

2005-11-10 Thread Liaw, Andy
Dear R-help, I am trying to build R-2.2.0-patched (2005-11-07 r36217) on the head node of a Scyld cluster (dual Opteron 250s) using PGI compilers (v6.0). I used the flags suggested by Jennifer Lai on R-devel (taken from R-admin, except that I had to add -L/usr/X11R6/lib64 to LDFLAGS). The build

Re: [R] make three plot to one plot

2005-10-21 Thread Jan Sabee
Thanks to Marc and Gabor. Have a nice weekend. Best, Jan Sabee On 10/21/05, Jan Sabee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear all, > I want to make three plot below to only one plot together with legend, > how can I do that? > I have tried with matplot function but I did not succeed. > Thanks for your h

Re: [R] make three plot to one plot

2005-10-21 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
# we can create a zoo object library(zoo) z <- merge(five = zoo(test.five.y, test.five.x), six = zoo(test.six.y, test.six.x), seven = zoo(test.seven.y, test.seven.x)) # and then plot it all in one go using na.approx to fill in generated NAs plot(na.approx(z), plot.type = "single",

Re: [R] make three plot to one plot

2005-10-21 Thread Marc Schwartz (via MN)
On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 21:13 +0200, Jan Sabee wrote: > Dear all, > I want to make three plot below to only one plot together with legend, > how can I do that? > I have tried with matplot function but I did not succeed. > Thanks for your help. > Sincerelly, > Jan Sabee > > test.five.x <- > c(0.02,0

[R] make three plot to one plot

2005-10-21 Thread Jan Sabee
Dear all, I want to make three plot below to only one plot together with legend, how can I do that? I have tried with matplot function but I did not succeed. Thanks for your help. Sincerelly, Jan Sabee test.five.x <- c(0.02,0.05,0.07,0.09,0.10,0.12,0.13,0.14,0.16,0.17,0.20,0.21,0.34,0.40) test.fi

[R] make some possible neighbourhoods

2005-10-07 Thread Muhammad Subianto
Dear all, I want to make some possible neighbourhoods in dataset below, V1 <- c(0,1,2,3) V2 <- c(0,1) V3 <- c(0,1,2) V4 <- c(0,1,2,3,4) and then I have a domain which the number of each variables. For dataset above a domain, domains <- c(3,1,2,4) To create the neighbourhoods I choice

Re: [R] playing with R: make a animated GIF file...

2005-10-06 Thread Tuszynski, Jaroslaw W.
See write.gif function in caTools. Jarek -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of klebyn Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 8:05 PM To: r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch Subject: [R] playing with R: make a animated GIF file... Hello all I am playing

[R] playing with R: make a animated GIF file...

2005-10-06 Thread Katharine Mullen
you could first make the frames to put together in R, then outside of R glue the frames into a gif. eg: frames<-10 for(i in 1:frames) { jpeg(paste("ani_", i, ".jpg", sep = "")) plot(1:10,1:10, col = i) dev.off() } then use an image editing program to glue the jpgs together --

Re: [R] playing with R: make a animated GIF file...

2005-10-05 Thread vincent
klebyn a écrit : > my objective: > 1) to save PNG files; > -> i don't know the best way to make this; ?png (also bmp(), jpg() available) hih __ R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the p

[R] playing with R: make a animated GIF file...

2005-10-05 Thread klebyn
Hello all I am playing with R for to make a animated GIF. any suggestions, improvements are welcome :-) case somebody could help me, i thanks! Cleber N. Borges ( klebyn ) my objective: (steps TODO) --- 1) to save PNG files; -> i don't know the best way to make thi

Re: [R] Make check fails on d-p-q-r-tests.R...

2005-09-27 Thread Jeff Ross
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > I am afraid this does look like a real problem, if a minor one. We have for > the first problem > > x <- 10^(ex <- c(1,2,5*(1:5),50,100,200,300,Inf)) > ex <- -c(rev(1/x), ex) > qcauchy(ex, log=TRUE) > > The first entry of the result should be Inf

Re: [R] Make check fails on d-p-q-r-tests.R...

2005-09-27 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
I am afraid this does look like a real problem, if a minor one. We have for the first problem x <- 10^(ex <- c(1,2,5*(1:5),50,100,200,300,Inf)) ex <- -c(rev(1/x), ex) qcauchy(ex, log=TRUE) The first entry of the result should be Inf and the last -Inf. From the output you have shown us I would

[R] make check in ~/fem outputs only 1 test, huh ?

2005-09-27 Thread Courtney Thomas
fem-4.0.1 [and all the other modules, except post] compiles OK, AFAIK, but when I do a make check only 1 test is reported, as follows: making checksrc making checkview3d making checkviewaxis making checktests make check-TESTS $ELMER_HOME undefined, setting it to ../src CC: no

Re: [R] Make check fails on d-p-q-r-tests.R...

2005-09-27 Thread Jeff Ross
On 1:03:39 am 09/27/05 Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You will have to show us the error! It will be shown in > d-p-q-r-tests.Rout.fail (unless this was a segfault or similar). > > It is not OK to skip the test, but note that this test is random and > does fail about 1 in 50 time

Re: [R] Make check fails on d-p-q-r-tests.R...

2005-09-27 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
You will have to show us the error! It will be shown in d-p-q-r-tests.Rout.fail (unless this was a segfault or similar). It is not OK to skip the test, but note that this test is random and does fail about 1 in 50 times, so you could just try rerunning it. On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Jeff Ross wrote

[R] Make check fails on d-p-q-r-tests.R...

2005-09-26 Thread Jeff Ross
Hi, R-2.1.1 OS: OpenBSD-current (3.8) on i386 Compiler:gcc version 3.3.5 (propolice) Thread model: single configure \ --with-readline \ --with-tcltk \ --with-tcl-config=/usr/local/lib/tcl8.4/tclConfig.sh \ --with-tk-config=/usr/local/lib/tk8.4/tkConfig.sh \ --with-libpng \ --with-jpe

Re: [R] make check FAILS -> Error code 1...comparing d-p-q-r-tests.Rout

2005-09-15 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
The problem is a known one and solved in R 2.1.1-patched. On your OS the result is not as accurate as most, but the tolerance set was too tight so the test failure is not something to worry about. Please install R-patched instead, as it has many bug fixes in place. On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Courtne

[R] make check FAILS -> Error code 1...comparing d-p-q-r-tests.Rout

2005-09-15 Thread Courtney Thomas
Under FreeBSD 5.3, attempting to properly install R-2.1.1, I get the following response when I. % make ;all finishes without error, then... % make check . . -- comparing d-p-q-r-tests.Rout to d-p-q-r-tests.Rout.save 1004

Re: [R] make error: X11/Intrinsic.h: No such,,,

2005-08-08 Thread Jake Michaelson
I use Mac OS X at home and Linux at work, so the R Aqua GUI has spoiled me. I have not seen its equal so far (on Windows or Linux). The most important thing to me is how easily accessible the help and documentation is. I like how when I begin typing a function, the form and arguments to the func

Re: [R] make error: X11/Intrinsic.h: No such,,,

2005-08-08 Thread Martin Maechler
> "Jake" == Jake Michaelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > on Fri, 05 Aug 2005 14:39:49 -0600 writes: Jake> Thanks for the help -- this morning someone (on the Jake> Ubuntu boards) was kind enough to point this out to Jake> me. Now if there were only a decent Linux front Jake> e

Re: [R] make error: X11/Intrinsic.h: No such,,,

2005-08-05 Thread Jake Michaelson
Thanks for the help -- this morning someone (on the Ubuntu boards) was kind enough to point this out to me. Now if there were only a decent Linux front end/gui for R... Thanks, Jake On Fri, 2005-08-05 at 13:17 -0700, Tak Ishikida wrote: > I had the same problem with my ubuntu machine. A search

[R] make error: X11/Intrinsic.h: No such,,,

2005-08-05 Thread Tak Ishikida
I had the same problem with my ubuntu machine. A search for a Debian package that includes the header file Intrinsic.h at http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages (with stable distribution and Intel x86 architecture) turned up libdevel/libxt-dev package. I installed libxt-dev package (with the syna

Re: [R] make error: X11/Intrinsic.h: No such,,,

2005-08-03 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Wed, 3 Aug 2005, Jake Michaelson wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm trying to build R 2.1.1 on Ubuntu 5.04 i686-SMP. Configure goes well > with: > > ./configure --with-BLAS --with-readline=no > > but once I run 'make', I get the following error: > > In file included from devX11.c:64: > devX11.h:57:74: X1

[R] make error: X11/Intrinsic.h: No such,,,

2005-08-03 Thread Jake Michaelson
Hi all, I'm trying to build R 2.1.1 on Ubuntu 5.04 i686-SMP. Configure goes well with: ./configure --with-BLAS --with-readline=no but once I run 'make', I get the following error: In file included from devX11.c:64: devX11.h:57:74: X11/Intrinsic.h: No such file or directory Any ideas? Thanks

[R] make error: X11/Intrinsic.h: No such,,,

2005-08-03 Thread Jake Michaelson
Hi all, I'm trying to build R 2.1.1 on Ubuntu 5.04 i686-SMP. Configure goes well with: ./configure --with-BLAS --with-readline=no but once I run 'make', I get the following error: In file included from devX11.c:64: devX11.h:57:74: X11/Intrinsic.h: No such file or directory Any ideas? Thanks

Re: [R] Make matrix from SQL query result

2005-06-24 Thread bogdan romocea
rge(allret,idret[[as.character(i)]],all=TRUE) } > -Original Message- > From: Gilbert Wu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005 12:36 PM > To: r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch > Subject: [R] Make matrix from SQL query result > > > Hi, > >

Re: [R] Make matrix from SQL query result

2005-06-24 Thread Jim Brennan
uot;) date returns.1 returns.2 1 20050619 0.12 0.03 3 20050620 -0.01 0.01 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gilbert Wu Sent: June 24, 2005 12:36 PM To: r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch Subject: [R] Make matrix from SQL query

Re: [R] Make matrix from SQL query result

2005-06-24 Thread Patrick Burns
Gilbert, This is untested, but something like: function(x) { uniq.col <- unique(x[,1]) uniq.row <- unique(x[,2]) ans <- array(NA, c(length(uniq.row), length(uniq.col)), list(uniq.row, uniq.col)) ans[cbind(match(x[,2], uniq.row), match(x[,1], uniq.col))] <- x[,3] ans } Pat

[R] Make matrix from SQL query result

2005-06-24 Thread Gilbert Wu
Hi, I am trying to form a matrix from a SQL query result. The SQL query result looks like this: equity_id date returns 1 20050619 0.12 2 20050619 0.03 1 20050620 -0.01 2 20050620

Re: [R] make install on solaris 10

2005-06-06 Thread roger koenker
On Jun 6, 2005, at 10:08 AM, Peter Dalgaard wrote: It's your missing (or outdated) makeinfo that is coming back to bite you. However, I'm a bit confuzzled because we do ship resources.html et al. as part of the R tarball, so there shouldn't be a need to build them. Were you building from an S

Re: [R] make install on solaris 10

2005-06-06 Thread Peter Dalgaard
roger koenker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > We have recently upgraded to Solaris 10 on a couple of sparc machines > with the usual > mildly mysterious consequences for library locations, etc, etc. I've > managed to configure > R 2.1.0 for a 64 bit version with: > > R is now configured for sparc-

Re: [R] make install on solaris 10

2005-06-06 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, roger koenker wrote: We have recently upgraded to Solaris 10 on a couple of sparc machines with the usual mildly mysterious consequences for library locations, etc, etc. I've managed to configure R 2.1.0 for a 64 bit version with: R is now configured for sparc-sun-solaris

[R] make install on solaris 10

2005-06-06 Thread roger koenker
We have recently upgraded to Solaris 10 on a couple of sparc machines with the usual mildly mysterious consequences for library locations, etc, etc. I've managed to configure R 2.1.0 for a 64 bit version with: R is now configured for sparc-sun-solaris2.10 Source directory: . In

Re: [R] make check fails after building R 2.1.0 on Fedora Core 3

2005-05-14 Thread Bill Barnard
On Sat, 2005-05-14 at 22:39 +0200, Peter Dalgaard wrote: > .Internal(PS(file, sounds like it might come from an earlier > version of R. It doesn't appear in my version of the 2.1.0(-patched) > sources. Bingo. It's the old mixed versions problem (I should have thought of that...) My existing

Re: [R] make check fails after building R 2.1.0 on Fedora Core 3

2005-05-14 Thread Peter Dalgaard
Bill Barnard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have R v2.0.1 already running on the machine in question; a fairly > generic Fedora Core 3 machine. I am trying to build the new version > 2.1.0 and have not been able to troubleshoot the problem I encountered. > I'm hoping someone else has seen it and

[R] make check fails after building R 2.1.0 on Fedora Core 3

2005-05-14 Thread Bill Barnard
I have R v2.0.1 already running on the machine in question; a fairly generic Fedora Core 3 machine. I am trying to build the new version 2.1.0 and have not been able to troubleshoot the problem I encountered. I'm hoping someone else has seen it and can suggest a troubleshooting avenue to me. The b

[R] R make error

2005-05-12 Thread Ambika Sundaresan
Hi: I tried to install the latest version of R (2-1.0)in an AIX machine . I was able to tar, and configure with no errors. However, when I said make, I got the following errors: gcc -Wl,-bM:SRE -Wl,-H512 -Wl,-T512 -Wl,-bnoentry -Wl,-bexpall -Wl,-bI:../../../etc/R.exp -L/usr/local/lib -o R_X1

RE: [R] make R package for windows on Linux

2005-01-05 Thread Liaw, Andy
> From: Marc Schwartz > > On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 09:34 +, Halldor Björnsson wrote: > > Hi, > > I made a package on a linux box. All worked fine. > > The package contains only R code (no C). I then wanted to > make a zip > > file so that I could test the package on a windows machine. > I have

Re: [R] make R package for windows on Linux

2005-01-05 Thread Paulo Justiniano Ribeiro Jr
Hi I do it for the geoR package following the excelent and detailed instructions provided by Yan and Rossini: "Building Microsoft Windows Versions of R and R packages under Intel Linux" available at the Contributed Documentation in the R web-site Notice that not having C/Fortran/C++ code make t

Re: [R] make R package for windows on Linux

2005-01-05 Thread Marc Schwartz
On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 09:34 +, Halldor BjÃrnsson wrote: > Hi, > I made a package on a linux box. All worked fine. > The package contains only R code (no C). I then wanted to make a zip > file so that I could test the package on a windows machine. I have tried > all the obvious ways to do this

[R] make R package for windows on Linux

2005-01-05 Thread Halldor Björnsson
Hi, I made a package on a linux box. All worked fine. The package contains only R code (no C). I then wanted to make a zip file so that I could test the package on a windows machine. I have tried all the obvious ways to do this (and even some that are not!), but to no avail. The only instructio

Re: [R] Make a table

2004-12-22 Thread Muhammad Subianto
Thanks to all of you. That's what I want. Best wishes, Muhammad Subianto Try tapply(prevRND.dat$Z, list(X=prevRND.dat$X, Y=prevRND.dat$Y), mean) __ Andy Jaworskitry: try: tapply( Z, list( X, Y ), mean ) -- Bendix Carstensen How about: xtabs(Z ~ X

Re: [R] Make a table

2004-12-22 Thread Marc Schwartz
On Wed, 2004-12-22 at 14:26 +0100, Muhammad Subianto wrote: > Dear useR, > > I have a dataset like this below, > > prevRND.dat <- read.table("C:\\workdir\\prevRND.txt", > + header=FALSE, # No header. > + col.names = c("X","Y","Z"), > +

RE: [R] Make a table

2004-12-22 Thread BXC (Bendix Carstensen)
-- > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Muhammad Subianto > Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 2:26 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [R] Make a table > > > Dear useR, > > I have a datas

Re: [R] Make a table

2004-12-22 Thread apjaworski
ubject [R] Make a table 12/22/2004 07:26

[R] Make a table

2004-12-22 Thread Muhammad Subianto
Dear useR, I have a dataset like this below, > prevRND.dat <- read.table("C:\\workdir\\prevRND.txt", + header=FALSE, # No header. + col.names = c("X","Y","Z"), + sep = ",") > prevRND.dat X YZ 1 A A 0.950933 2

Re: [R] make check-all failed on SLES8 for x86_64

2004-12-14 Thread Peter Dalgaard
"Liaw, Andy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi all, > > I've only now noticed that on our Opteron boxes running Suse Enterprise > Server 8 that R-2.0.1 did not pass make chek-all. It bombed in > tests/lapack.R at: > > > eigenok <- function(A, E, Eps = 1000 * .Machine$double.eps) { > V <- E$v

RE: [R] make check-all failed on SLES8 for x86_64

2004-12-14 Thread Liaw, Andy
Thanks for reminding me of that thread, Roger. I've forgotten all about it... Strangely, several people reported no problem with optimized BLAS, but I tried linking against the latest version (0.96, threaded), and got the same failure. I will try to see if I can upgrade GCC. Best, Andy > From:

Re: [R] make check-all failed on SLES8 for x86_64

2004-12-14 Thread Roger D. Peng
Martin Maechler brought this up a while back (and added the regression test). I believe it was a compiler problem and upgrading to gcc 3.4.1 fixed it. See the thread starting here: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2004-July/030260.html -roger Liaw, Andy wrote: Hi all, I've only now notice

[R] make check-all failed on SLES8 for x86_64

2004-12-14 Thread Liaw, Andy
Hi all, I've only now noticed that on our Opteron boxes running Suse Enterprise Server 8 that R-2.0.1 did not pass make chek-all. It bombed in tests/lapack.R at: > eigenok <- function(A, E, Eps = 1000 * .Machine$double.eps) { V <- E$vect lam <- E$values stopifnot(abs(A %*% V - V %*%

Re: [R] make apply() return a list

2004-11-02 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
Arne Henningsen email.uni-kiel.de> writes: : : On Tuesday 02 November 2004 15:29, Gabor Grothendieck wrote: : > Arne Henningsen email.uni-kiel.de> writes: : > : Hi, : > : : > : thank you very much Sundar, Patrick, Tony, Mahub and Gabor for your : > : helpful answers! All your examples work grea

Re: [R] make apply() return a list

2004-11-02 Thread Arne Henningsen
On Tuesday 02 November 2004 15:29, Gabor Grothendieck wrote: > Arne Henningsen email.uni-kiel.de> writes: > : Hi, > : > : thank you very much Sundar, Patrick, Tony, Mahub and Gabor for your > : helpful answers! All your examples work great. They are all more > : straightforeward than my example an

  1   2   >