Re: [R] make install on solaris 10

2005-06-06 Thread roger koenker
On Jun 6, 2005, at 10:08 AM, Peter Dalgaard wrote: It's your missing (or outdated) makeinfo that is coming back to bite you. However, I'm a bit confuzzled because we do ship resources.html et al. as part of the R tarball, so there shouldn't be a need to build them. Were you building from an S

Re: [R] make install on solaris 10

2005-06-06 Thread Peter Dalgaard
roger koenker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > We have recently upgraded to Solaris 10 on a couple of sparc machines > with the usual > mildly mysterious consequences for library locations, etc, etc. I've > managed to configure > R 2.1.0 for a 64 bit version with: > > R is now configured for sparc-

Re: [R] make install on solaris 10

2005-06-06 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, roger koenker wrote: We have recently upgraded to Solaris 10 on a couple of sparc machines with the usual mildly mysterious consequences for library locations, etc, etc. I've managed to configure R 2.1.0 for a 64 bit version with: R is now configured for sparc-sun-solaris

[R] make install on solaris 10

2005-06-06 Thread roger koenker
We have recently upgraded to Solaris 10 on a couple of sparc machines with the usual mildly mysterious consequences for library locations, etc, etc. I've managed to configure R 2.1.0 for a 64 bit version with: R is now configured for sparc-sun-solaris2.10 Source directory: . In