Re: [R] multiple imputation with fit.mult.impute in Hmisc

2003-07-28 Thread Jonathan Baron
Thanks for the quick reply! One more question, below. On 07/27/03 22:20, Frank E Harrell Jr wrote: On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 14:47:30 -0400 Jonathan Baron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have always avoided missing data by keeping my distance from the real world. But I have a student who is doing a

Re: [R] multiple imputation with fit.mult.impute in Hmisc

2003-07-28 Thread Frank E Harrell Jr
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 08:18:09 -0400 Jonathan Baron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for the quick reply! One more question, below. On 07/27/03 22:20, Frank E Harrell Jr wrote: On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 14:47:30 -0400 Jonathan Baron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have always avoided missing data by

[R] multiple imputation with fit.mult.impute in Hmisc

2003-07-27 Thread Jonathan Baron
I have always avoided missing data by keeping my distance from the real world. But I have a student who is doing a study of real patients. We're trying to test regression models using multiple imputation. We did the following (roughly): f - aregImpute(~ [list of 32 variables, separated by +

Re: [R] multiple imputation with fit.mult.impute in Hmisc

2003-07-27 Thread Frank E Harrell Jr
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 14:47:30 -0400 Jonathan Baron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have always avoided missing data by keeping my distance from the real world. But I have a student who is doing a study of real patients. We're trying to test regression models using multiple imputation. We did the