A.J. Rossini wrote:
For OBVIOUS reasons, is there any chance that we could introduce
package() and deprecate library()?
(well, I'll also ask if we could deprecate = for assignment, but
that's hopeless).
Amen to both suggestions.
cheers,
Martin Maechler writes
It's called ``package'', not library --- please take note (sigh...)
Why not make the library() function deprecated and replace
it with package() or load.package()?
I'm afraid as long as the function to load these things is
called library, I'm in danger of calling
