Dear Prof. Bates and Group:
I hope it is not to late to revisit this thread. My concern is with the
difference in standard errors estimated from data that is arranged as
grouped (data.1) and ungrouped (data.2). With the grouped data set, the
effect of treatment is highly significant; with
Hello All,
I have a question regarding how glmmPQL should be specified. Which of
these two is correct?
summary(fm.3 - glmmPQL(cbind(response, 100 - response) ~ expt,
data = data.1, random = ~ 1 | subject,
family = binomial))
summary(fm.4 -
Hello Dr. Bates and group,
I understand, the attached data file did not accompany my original
message. I have listed below the code used to create that file.
data.1 - data.frame(subject = factor(rep(c(one, two, three, four,
five, six, seven,
On 9/4/05, Andrew R. Criswell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Dr. Bates and group,
I understand, the attached data file did not accompany my original
message. I have listed below the code used to create that file.
data.1 - data.frame(subject = factor(rep(c(one, two, three, four,
