On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 09:05 -0400, Jonathan Baron wrote:
> I was able to compile R-2.0.0 successfully on another fc3
> computer, theoretically identical to the first three. I'm sorry
> for starting this thread.
>
> It does seem that I had a problem that resulted from having only
> tk and tcl, but
I was able to compile R-2.0.0 successfully on another fc3
computer, theoretically identical to the first three. I'm sorry
for starting this thread.
It does seem that I had a problem that resulted from having only
tk and tcl, but not tk-devel and tcl-devel. Perhaps after I
installed these I forgo
On Sun, 24 Apr 2005, Liaw, Andy wrote:
On my FC3 for x86_64 (Athlon64 3000+) at home, R-patched from today compiled
just fine, and tcltk works. The version of tcl, tcl-devel, tk and tk-devel
are all 8.4.7-2.
Indeed. Since FC3 is the platform used by two (at least) of R-core and
both have 64-bit
On my FC3 for x86_64 (Athlon64 3000+) at home, R-patched from today compiled
just fine, and tcltk works. The version of tcl, tcl-devel, tk and tk-devel
are all 8.4.7-2.
Cheers,
Andy
> From: Jonathan Baron
>
> I installed from source on Fedora Core 3 starting with the
> command
>
> ./configure
