RE: [R] performance gap between R 1.7.1 and 1.8.0

2003-12-05 Thread Luke Tierney
If you look at the by.total components what you get is that for 1.7.1 summaryRprof(Rprof.out.1.7.1)$by.total[1:30,] total.time total.pct self.time self.pct boot 1.72 100.0 0.00 0.0 ... validObject0.14 8.1 0.00 0.0

RE: [R] performance gap between R 1.7.1 and 1.8.0

2003-12-04 Thread Liaw, Andy
From: Martin Maechler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [...] A very first step of diagnosis might be to activate trace(read.dcf) trace(library) options(verbose = TRUE) A step further might be to patch read.dcf such that it prints info if(getOption(verbose)) { print what I am

Re: [R] performance gap between R 1.7.1 and 1.8.0

2003-12-04 Thread Peter Dalgaard
Liaw, Andy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm really out of ideas at this point. Can anyone see the problem given the above, or at least tell me what to try next? Hmm. Looking into the actual Rprof.out file is sometimes revealing. Could you provide a link to it (I assume it might be a bit large

Re: [R] performance gap between R 1.7.1 and 1.8.0

2003-11-29 Thread Martin Maechler
AndyL == Liaw, Andy [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 28 Nov 2003 22:19:27 -0500 writes: AndyL Dear R-help, A colleague of mine was running some AndyL code on two of our boxes, and noticed a rather large AndyL difference in running time. We've so far isolated AndyL the problem to