It will make them run.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 23.10.2020 23:52, Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal wrote:
Thanks. I had a feeling that was the case from looking at the queue. Does the
clearing make them run or do they need to be resubmitted?
-Roy
On Oct 23, 2020, at 2:43 PM, Uwe Ligges wrote:
Thanks. I had a feeling that was the case from looking at the queue. Does the
clearing make them run or do they need to be resubmitted?
-Roy
> On Oct 23, 2020, at 2:43 PM, Uwe Ligges
> wrote:
>
> Generally by submission time, but there is a series of packages unprocessed
> stuck in the qu
Generally by submission time, but there is a series of packages
unprocessed stuck in the queue, will clear that up shortly.
Best,
Uwe
On 23.10.2020 19:17, Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal via R-package-devel
wrote:
Just out of curiousity, how is pretest order determined? I have a package
th
I've made an example at https://github.com/tjtnew/newbies that uses
GitHub actions to monitor how many hours a package has been in the
"newbies" queue. It updates hourly and saves to a csv in the repo.
It's not something I have time to develop more but if someone wants to
pick it up and take it fu
Hi Uwe,
Thanks for taking the time to reply.
Would you be willing to clarify/confirm the current situation regarding the
hosting of non-FOSS packages on CRAN, such as those with ACM or Creative
Commons license variants that have non-commercial use restrictions?
These are presently included in
Just out of curiousity, how is pretest order determined? I have a package
that was submitted yesterday that is still waiting pretest, while one I
submitted today was just pretested. Both are just bug fixes of existing
packages, not new packages.
Thanks for the info and the work on CRAN,
> On Oct 23, 2020, at 8:25 AM, Ege Rubak wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> My two cents are below Marc's summary here:
>
> On Thu, 2020-10-22 at 20:33 -0400, Marc Schwartz wrote:
>> Right now, the interpretation, without further clarification from
>> CRAN, would be, it is ok for a package to be on CRAN
Hi Uwe,
Thanks for your reply.
I appreciate all of the efforts by the CRAN team here.
Regards,
Marc
> On Oct 23, 2020, at 8:47 AM, Uwe Ligges
> wrote:
>
> Windows binaries may be delayed these days, but they are generated in a bunch
> R-flavour-wise. They typical delay after a source pack
Hi All,
Just a quick note to indicate that one of the two Windows binaries for the
package appeared overnight (EDT). Not sure if this experience is representative
for others, or just a temporary bump in the road.
Regards,
Marc
> On Oct 21, 2020, at 2:08 PM, Marc Schwartz wrote:
>
> Hi All,
My personal opinion is that as long as a package doesn't actually make it on to
CRAN, you don't need to bump the version. It's worked so far
-Original Message-
From: R-package-devel On Behalf Of Ben
Bolker
Sent: Saturday, 24 October 2020 2:23 AM
To: r-package-devel@r-project.org
Sub
https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/plotdap_0.0.8_20201023_155845/Windows/00check.log
my problem is I don't have Windows myself. So I assume if I can pass both
winbuilders I should be good. Here is the link to winbuilder_release I just
ran:
https://win-builder.r-project.org/
Can you share the links to the CRAN pre-test logs? Someone here
might be able to guess what went wrong ...
(FWIW I always *think* I'm testing very carefully, and I almost
always get something wrong ...)
On 10/23/20 11:18 AM, Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal via R-package-devel
wrote:
I
I test my packages very carefully before submission. Earlier today I submitted
a package that passed this morning on both winbuilder_release and
winbuilder_devel. The pre-test submission failed on rebuilding the vignette.
I just tried again on winbuilder_release and winbuilder_devel, no prob
I do not want to make many general comments about licenses in public, as
this is a very difficult matter and I am not a lawyer.
But let me cite from the CRAN policies:
"Packages with licenses not listed at
https://svn.r-project.org/R/trunk/share/licenses/license.db will
generally not be accep
Windows binaries may be delayed these days, but they are generated in a
bunch R-flavour-wise. They typical delay after a source package
publication should be less then 72 hours ideally.
Best,
Uwe
On 23.10.2020 14:05, Marc Schwartz wrote:
Hi All,
Just a quick note to indicate that one of the
Hi all,
My two cents are below Marc's summary here:
On Thu, 2020-10-22 at 20:33 -0400, Marc Schwartz wrote:
> Right now, the interpretation, without further clarification from
> CRAN, would be, it is ok for a package to be on CRAN with license
> based usage restrictions included (e.g. for non-com
16 matches
Mail list logo
