Re: [R-pkg-devel] Troubleshooting Winbuilder Run Timeouts

2023-12-07 Thread Ivan Krylov
On Thu, 7 Dec 2023 12:22:11 -0500 Andrew Robbins wrote: > I just benchmarked devtools::check() (which is actually a build > followed by a check) on my Ryzen 5700X/intel 660p system with a bunch > of stuff going on in the background and got just over 11 minutes. I > don't actually think its timing

Re: [R-pkg-devel] problems with Maintainers in DESCRIPTION file

2023-12-07 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 7 December 2023 at 20:58, María Olga Viedma Sillero wrote: | I receive the same note after fixing it, removing it, and checking Authors@R. I think the rejection is a false positive. | | Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc, r-devel-windows-x86_64 | Check: CRAN incoming feasibility, Result

[R-pkg-devel] problems with Maintainers in DESCRIPTION file

2023-12-07 Thread María Olga Viedma Sillero
Dear all, I receive the same note after fixing it, removing it, and checking Authors@R. I think the rejection is a false positive. Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc, r-devel-windows-x86_64 Check: CRAN incoming feasibility, Result: NOTE Maintainer: 'Olga Viedma mailto:olga.vie...@uc

[R-pkg-devel] Getting 'Rscript: Bad address' error when CRAN build my package on windows platforms

2023-12-07 Thread Serge
Hello, I'm the maintener of the rtkore package and I'm experimenting an error during the installation on the |r-devel-windows-x86_64| and the |r-release-windows-x86_64| platform. When trying to compile I get |g++ -std=gnu++11 -I"D:/RCompile/recent/R-4.3.2/include" -DNDEBUG -I../inst/projects/

Re: [R-pkg-devel] NOTE: Examples with CPU time > 2.5 times elapsed time

2023-12-07 Thread Artur Araujo
Dear Ivan, I modified the example in: https://github.com/arturstat/TPmsm/blob/main/man/as.data.frame.survTP.Rd And it finally passed CRAN incoming checks: https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/TPmsm_1.2.12_20231207_221140/Debian/00check.log Thank you. Best regards, Artur ___

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Troubleshooting Winbuilder Run Timeouts

2023-12-07 Thread Andrew Robbins via R-package-devel
Hi again, I just double checked the test invocations of INMF which are on /much/ larger matrices with /far/ more iterations and am still seeing zero seconds. That /is/ a bug, but its not a related one. The objective error of 44244.4 is what it should be returning for the example matrices. I

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Troubleshooting Winbuilder Run Timeouts

2023-12-07 Thread Ivan Krylov
On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 17:16:37 -0500 Andrew Robbins via R-package-devel wrote: > Every time, it reports a runtime of zero seconds for INMF res1 I get exactly 0 seconds for both res1 and res2 on both my Windows machines and on my Linux machine. I had discounted that as an integer type used somewhere