I can understand caution about functions with side effects, but rejecting a
package on those grounds alone seems strange to me.
I can easily find thousands of calls to par() on CRAN without any
associated on.exit() cleanup ([1] [2] [3] [4] with a full regex search [5])
[1]
https://github.com/cran
В Mon, 18 Aug 2025 12:19:40 +0100
Rasha Shraim via R-package-devel пишет:
> \if{html}{\out{World region coverage:}\out{ style="text-align:
> left">}\figure{March2025_vitD_cloudy_world.png}{options:
> style="width:500px;max-width:50\%;"}\out{}}
If you add an empty line between \figure{...} and \o
Hi Kristian,
Also replying to the list.
Thanks for the suggestion. Personally I have something like the
following in my ~/.Rprofile
if (interactive() && terminalgraphics::has_tgp_support()) {
options(device = terminalgraphics::tgp)
}
So that doesn't work well with your suggestion, but crea
Someone asked for the response I got from CRAN. I included it below:
---
[... another issue where I forgot a \value{} in the documentation of one
of the functions]
Please make sure that you do not change the user's options, par or
working directory. If you really have to do so within funct
