Check: CRAN incoming feasibility, Result: Note_to_CRAN_maintainers
Maintainer: 'Chris Brien mailto:chris.br...@adelaide.edu.au'
Flavor: r-devel-windows-x86_64
Check: examples, Result: NOTE
Examples with CPU (user + system) or elapsed time > 10s
user system elap
I have chosen a file.
Thanks very much for your help. All's well that ends well.
Cheers,
Chris
> -Original Message-
> From: Ivan Krylov
> Sent: Saturday, 14 January 2023 8:45 AM
> To: Chris Brien
> Cc: r-package-devel@r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [R-pkg-de
t; Sent: Saturday, 14 January 2023 12:37 AM
> To: Chris Brien
> Cc: r-package-devel@r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Failed CRAN tar.gz upload to CRAN
>
> CAUTION: External email. Only click on links or open attachments from
> trusted senders.
>
> В Fri, 13 Jan
as to what is causing the problem. Can anyone throw any lot on
what the problem might be?
Thanks in advance,
Cheers,
Chris
Chris Brien | Senior Biostatistician
Australian Plant Phenomics Facility
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https
PM
To: Chris Brien; 'r-package-devel@r-project.org'
Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] update.formula does not keep.order
CAUTION: External email. Only click on links or open attachments from trusted
senders.
On 27/10/2021 7:16 p.m., Chris Brien wrote:
> Hi listers,
>
>
>
> I have a pac
Hi listers,
I have a package asremlPlus on CRAN that manipulates formulae. It uses the
keep.order argument, as in the stats::terms function, to allow control over the
order of terms in a model.
However, when stats::update.formula is used to update a formula, there is no
keep.order
?
Thanks in advance for any help,
Cheers,
Chris Brien
Adjunct Associate Professor in Statistics
-
School of Information Technology & Mathematical Sciences
University of South Australia
GPO Box 2471
ADELAIDE 5001 South Australia
Phone: +61 8 8302 5535 Fax: +61 8 8302 5785
Emai
[mailto:lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de]
Sent: Monday, 4 March 2019 7:16 PM
To: Chris Brien; 'r-package-devel@r-project.org'
Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] License note on CRAN submission
On 04.03.2019 05:34, Chris Brien wrote:
> I recently submitted an updated version of my package asremlPlus to C
2008 r-devel
and Fedora linux, r-devel, clang was as follows:
-
License components with restrictions and base license permitting such:
MIT + file LICENSE
File 'LICENSE':
YEAR: 2019
COPYRIGHT HOLDER: CHRIS BRIEN
Suggests or Enhances not in mainstream repositories:
asreml
* checking
4.1-21 of the package
to CRAN and this generated the following NOTE:
* checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
Maintainer: 'Chris Brien '
License components with restrictions and base license permitting such:
MIT + file LICENSE
File 'LICENSE':
YEAR: 2018-2019
COPYRIGHT HOLDER: CHRIS
to take.
Cheers,
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Martyn Plummer [mailto:plumm...@iarc.fr]
Sent: Wednesday, 24 January 2018 4:20 AM
To: Chris Brien; e...@debian.org; murdoch.dun...@gmail.com
Cc: r-package-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Licensing of an R package
On Tue, 2018
of packages.
Cheers,
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Martyn Plummer [mailto:plumm...@iarc.fr]
Sent: Tuesday, 23 January 2018 4:26 AM
To: Chris Brien; e...@debian.org; murdoch.dun...@gmail.com
Cc: r-package-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Licensing of an R package
On Fri
el
Sent: Saturday, 20 January 2018 2:30 AM
To: Duncan Murdoch
Cc: Chris Brien; r-package-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Licensing of an R package
Chris,
I am with Duncan here.
You can license _your_ package any way you want and prefer. I like GPL.
You seem to imply that the GPL
to be known, and the
desired behavior needs to be permitted.
Regards,
Brian
On 01/19/2018 04:19 AM, Chris Brien wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> Here are the answers:
>
> A) No, I am simply calling routines.
> B) By proprietary I mean that it is a commercial package.
> C) No, it seeme
To: Chris Brien
Cc: r-package-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Licensing of an R package
Chris,
you've not said what *you* would like the license for your software to do. You
could release the software under a "public domain", "no rights reserved" style
license
and that `foo' is not.
Thanks for your interest.
Cheers,
Chris
From: stefan.mckinnon.edwa...@gmail.com
[mailto:stefan.mckinnon.edwa...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Stefan McKinnon
Høj-Edwards
Sent: Friday, 19 January 2018 7:58 PM
To: Chris Brien
Cc: r-package-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel
for `foo' such that at
least the enhancements that it incorporates remain `free'?
Cheers,
Chris Brien
Adjunct Senior Lecturer in Statistics
-
Phenomics and Bioinformatics Research Centre
University of South Australia
GPO Box 2471
ADELAIDE 5001 South Australia
Phone: +61 8 8302 5535 Fax
[mailto:murdoch.dun...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, 16 December 2017 10:18 PM
To: Chris Brien; r-package-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Problem enhancing a package with a predict method
not declared to be an S3 method
On 15/12/2017 11:52 PM, Chris Brien wrote:
> Dear list members,
>
are 21 sets of
tests.
The manifest problem is "ie", which is another unexported function in asreml,
apparently called by predict.asreml.
Has anyone on this list advice to offer on how this problem might be overcome?
Any help gratefully received,
Chris Brien, University of South Aust
hat I do not know how I can get any further
information that would help to identify the problem.
Any suggestions as to how I might proceed towards a solution to this problem?
Cheers,
Chris Brien
Adjunct Senior Lecturer in Statistics
-
Phenomics and Bioinformatics Research Centre
20 matches
Mail list logo
