> On 16 Apr 2021, at 14:06, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
> On 16/04/2021 7:54 a.m., Hugh Parsonage wrote:
>> My 2c is that if a package has actually tested something like that
>> (say, the ordering of a list's elements), then it is 100% likely that
>> a script out there depends on that behaviour too
Thinking about it - what would be the easiest way, to copy the package,
excluding files in .Rbuidignore, into the temp directory?
I would like to use directly the .Rbuildignore file, to exclude the files from
copying.
Any suggestions?
> On 11 Feb 2020, at 10:20, Rainer M Krug wrote:
>
>
>
> On 8 Sep 2018, at 22:47, Spencer Graves
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2018-09-08 14:02, Joshua Ulrich wrote:
>> Hi Rainer,
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 2:28 AM, Rainer Krug wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I have a package at GitHub (https://gi
> On 7 Sep 2018, at 02:16, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
> On 06/09/2018 10:32 AM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 3:03 PM Duncan Murdoch
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 05/09/2018 2:20 PM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
I take a complementary approach; I condition on, my home-made,
R_TEST
Hi
I have a package at GitHub (https://github.com/rkrug/ROriginStamp) which I am
pre[paring for CRAN.
It creates a trusted timestamp using the API fro OriginStamp
(https://originstamp.org/home) which requires an API key. Now this API should
not be made public, as to much traffic through one AP
back if it works
> well.
>
>>
>> Alternatively, you may want to check grImport2 which imports svg.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Johannes
>>
>> Am Dienstag, 15. Mai 2018, 13:22:16 CEST schrieb Rainer Krug:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>>
Hi
I asked the question at stack exchange yesterday (
https://stackoverflow.com/q/50325139/632423 ) and did not get a response so
far, so I repost it here:
I have the following situation: I use an external command (plantuml -
http://plantuml.com/ ) to create a graph. This is done via R b
> On 11 May 2017, at 15:49, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
> On 11/05/2017 8:31 AM, Rainer Krug wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I am building two packages:
>>
>> - a data package which contains the data and function to extract it (several
>> datasets, linked, like
very release
> anyway - so this concurs with my suggestion.
>
> Best
>
> Holger
>
> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Rainer Krug <mailto:rai...@krugs.de>> wrote:
> Sorry - forgot to cc the list
>
> > Begin forwarded message:
> >
> > Fr
Sorry - forgot to cc the list
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: Rainer Krug
> Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Re-creating vignettes after update of data or
> different mechanism to create reports?
> Date: 11 May 2017 at 14:41:03 GMT+2
> To: Holger Hoefling
>
>
Hi
I am building two packages:
- a data package which contains the data and function to extract it (several
datasets, linked, like an sql database) and
- an analysis package which contains functions to analyse the data in the data
package and depends on the data package.
The data package is up
11 matches
Mail list logo