Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN Packages over 5 MB & Time Length for Manual Inspection

2023-02-03 Thread EcoC2S - Irucka Embry
Hey Rich, thank you for your response. In my case, I explained the reasoning to justify the USA.state.boundaries package being over 5 MB and why it is needed by iemisc, including providing previous e-mail discussions between Uwe and myself, on the various re-submittals of the USA.state.boundar

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN Packages over 5 MB & Time Length for Manual Inspection

2023-02-03 Thread EcoC2S - Irucka Embry
Ben, thank you for your response. The text2sdg package was added on 24 January 2023. I had created a drat repository called USA.state.boundaries.data to store the full set of maps (1 of which is needed for my iemisc package) and I had only a subset of the maps in the USA.state.boundaries packa

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN Packages over 5 MB & Time Length for Manual Inspection

2023-01-29 Thread Richard Shefferson
My understanding is that packages over 5MB are only allowed under exceptional circumstances. You would need to include a note in your submission explaining why it is over 5 MB. If it is not accepted, then the reason provided is not sufficient. I believe that the CRAN guidelines actually state this,

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN Packages over 5 MB & Time Length for Manual Inspection

2023-01-29 Thread Ben Bolker
Out of curiosity, what was the recently added package? It looks like the previous version of your package from about a year ago is only a 1.2MB tarball. Also out of curiosity, what caused the increase? cheers Ben Bolker On 2023-01-29 1:53 p.m., EcoC2S - Irucka Embry wrote: Greetin

[R-pkg-devel] CRAN Packages over 5 MB & Time Length for Manual Inspection

2023-01-29 Thread EcoC2S - Irucka Embry
Greetings! I submitted my USA.state.boundaries package on 6 January 2023 and Uwe responded back letting me know that it was over the 5 MB CRAN threshold. I responded back to Uwe letting him know that as of that date there were 52 CRAN packages over 5 MB. As of today (29 January 2023), there ar