Re: [R-pkg-devel] Problem with "additional repository".

2023-10-17 Thread Uwe Ligges
It was 0.0-20 that had another issue now explained privately. 0.0-21 passes cleanly. Best, Uwe On 17.10.2023 20:45, Ivan Krylov wrote: On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 17:08:28 +0200 Uwe Ligges wrote: I do not know which package this refers to, so cannot easily look. This seems to be about the eglhmm

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Problem with "additional repository".

2023-10-17 Thread Ivan Krylov
On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 17:08:28 +0200 Uwe Ligges wrote: > I do not know which package this refers to, so cannot easily look. This seems to be about the eglhmm package. It seems to pass --as-cran checks on my machine, but I know it's not the full set of checks performed for new packages. -- Best r

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Problem with "additional repository".

2023-10-16 Thread Uwe Ligges
Certainly there was more in the output that caused rejection as the stuff you describe below seems to be fine. I do not know which package this refers to, so cannot easily look. Best, Uwe On 16.10.2023 11:25, Duncan Murdoch wrote: Whoops, I just read the next line.  Sorry! On 15/10/2023 9:34

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Problem with "additional repository".

2023-10-16 Thread Duncan Murdoch
Whoops, I just read the next line. Sorry! On 15/10/2023 9:34 p.m., Rolf Turner wrote: I have submitted a new package to CRAN, and this package has been knocked back on the basis of a NOTE: * checking package dependencies ... NOTE Package suggested but not available for checking: 'ionChannelD

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Problem with "additional repository".

2023-10-16 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 15/10/2023 9:34 p.m., Rolf Turner wrote: I have submitted a new package to CRAN, and this package has been knocked back on the basis of a NOTE: * checking package dependencies ... NOTE Package suggested but not available for checking: 'ionChannelData' This suggested package consists of da

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Problem with "additional repository".

2023-10-15 Thread Iris Simmons
The packages in additional repositories are not installed on the CRAN checking machines. The NOTE is expected, but it's not a warning, so your package should still be allowed to upload to CRAN. You should not remove ionChannelData from Suggests because then the reference to that package in your doc

[R-pkg-devel] Problem with "additional repository".

2023-10-15 Thread Rolf Turner
I have submitted a new package to CRAN, and this package has been knocked back on the basis of a NOTE: > * checking package dependencies ... NOTE > Package suggested but not available for checking: 'ionChannelData' This suggested package consists of data sets, the size of which is too large to