Re: [R-pkg-devel] Resubmitting an archived package

2024-06-13 Thread Uwe Ligges
You have Check: C++ specification, Result: NOTE Specified C++11: please drop specification unless essential in your check reuslts and I see no response nor comment why it is. Best, Uwe Ligges On 12.06.2024 20:12, Lucas Godoy wrote: Hello everyone, Recently, my R package {smile} was arch

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Resubmitting an archived package

2024-06-12 Thread Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal via R-package-devel
If you run a spell checker before you submit then it helps if you put in your cran-comments.md file the list of words flagged and that all of them are correct. This makes it just a little easier for CRAN. -Roy > On Jun 12, 2024, at 3:35 PM, Ben Bolker wrote: > > As far as I know these are

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Resubmitting an archived package

2024-06-12 Thread Ben Bolker
As far as I know these are all harmless. * the first NOTE is for CRAN consumption * the rest are false positives The spell-checking machinery used in package checking is under-documented. There are some useful references here https://github.com/r-lib/usethis/issues/1466 https://ropen

[R-pkg-devel] Resubmitting an archived package

2024-06-12 Thread Lucas Godoy
Hello everyone, Recently, my R package {smile} was archived due to NOTES. At the time, I was in the final stages of my PhD and unfortunately, I couldn't address the issue in time to prevent the package from being archived. Long story short, I fixed the issues, and now the `R CMD check --as-cran`

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Resubmitting an archived package

2024-06-11 Thread Hervé Perdry
Thank you Uwe, I don't know how this last line in the note escaped my attention.. Sorry for the trouble Yours HP Envoyé avec la messagerie sécurisée Proton Mail. Le mardi 11 juin 2024 à 2:24 PM, Uwe Ligges a écrit : > Actually none of the reported things led to rejection, but the quote wa

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Resubmitting an archived package

2024-06-11 Thread Uwe Ligges
Actually none of the reported things led to rejection, but the quote was not complete, we also see "The Date field is over a month old." so please update the Date field and resubmit. Best, Uwe Ligges On 11.06.2024 14:17, Duncan Murdoch wrote: I'm not sure what you mean by the not

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Resubmitting an archived package

2024-06-11 Thread Duncan Murdoch
I'm not sure what you mean by the note interrupting the process. Did you submit it and get rejected? To me the notes look as though they are for information only, with the possible exception that CRAN prefers abbreviations like GWAS to be written in single quotes as 'GWAS'. You should defin

[R-pkg-devel] Resubmitting an archived package

2024-06-11 Thread Hervé Perdry
Hello, I 'm new here! I'm the maintainer of a handful of packages and should have subscribed long ago. Here's my problem. I didn't have time to deal with a compilation issue of my package milorGWAS a few months ago, and it has been archived. I've now corrected the issue and I want to resubmit i