Re: [R-sig-Debian] R 2.6.1

2007-11-29 Thread Vincent Goulet
Le jeu. 29 nov. à 12:34, Johannes Ranke a écrit : > Hi Dirk, dear all, > > I just finished backporting 2.6.1 to etch, and the backport just got > picked up by CRAN. I also included a rebuild of littler 0.0.11 from > unstable. The rkward backport is still working fine, as far as I can > tell, so I

Re: [R-sig-Debian] R 2.6.1

2007-11-29 Thread Johannes Ranke
Hi Dirk, dear all, I just finished backporting 2.6.1 to etch, and the backport just got picked up by CRAN. I also included a rebuild of littler 0.0.11 from unstable. The rkward backport is still working fine, as far as I can tell, so I didn't rebuild. Best regards, Johannes P.S.: BTW, Vincent w

Re: [R-sig-Debian] R 2.6.1

2007-11-26 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 26 November 2007 at 15:44, Tyler Smith wrote: | On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 01:21:20PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | > Debian testing users cannot run the unstable binaries as libc6 is ahead on | > unstable. We'll have to wait for libc6, or for Johannes' backports :) | | Any idea when 2.

Re: [R-sig-Debian] R 2.6.1

2007-11-26 Thread Tyler Smith
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 01:21:20PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > Debian testing users cannot run the unstable binaries as libc6 is ahead on > unstable. We'll have to wait for libc6, or for Johannes' backports :) Any idea when 2.6.0 will make it into testing? If I read the PTS info right, it

[R-sig-Debian] R 2.6.1

2007-11-26 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
R 2.6.1 is on its way to Debian unstable. I removed the references to gcc-4.2, so backporting should be easier. One thing I lfet in was the shlibs.local which will make R depend on tk8.4 newer than what testing and Ubuntu have, so Johannes and Vincent may need to remove the file. Debian testing u