Re: [R-sig-Fedora] rstan warning messages

2016-01-27 Thread Tom Callaway
On 01/27/2016 01:55 PM, Patrick, Larry B [CSSM] wrote: > Confirmed that gcc-gfortran is installed > Package gcc-gfortran-4.4.7-16.el6.x86_64 already installed and latest > version > What could I check next? Hm. Do you have libgfortran installed? ~tom == Red Hat ___

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] rstan warning messages

2016-01-27 Thread Patrick, Larry B [CSSM]
Confirmed that gcc-gfortran is installed Package gcc-gfortran-4.4.7-16.el6.x86_64 already installed and latest version What could I check next? I do not have the following installed and will get that done and tested again. libcurl-devel libidn-devel Thanks, Larry -Original M

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] rstan warning messages

2016-01-27 Thread Tom Callaway
On 01/27/2016 01:12 PM, Patrick, Larry B [CSSM] wrote: > RHEL 6 installed > R version 3.2.3 from EPEL installed > > Start R and use the following command, but got warnings! > > install.packages("rstan", dependencies = TRUE, repos = > "http://cran.r-project.org/";) > ... > g++ -m64 -shared -L/usr

[R-sig-Fedora] rstan warning messages

2016-01-27 Thread Patrick, Larry B [CSSM]
RHEL 6 installed R version 3.2.3 from EPEL installed Start R and use the following command, but got warnings! install.packages("rstan", dependencies = TRUE, repos = "http://cran.r-project.org/";) ... g++ -m64 -shared -L/usr/lib64/R/lib -L/usr/local/lib64 -o RcppEigen.so RcppEigen.o RcppExports.

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] html manual files nonfunctional

2016-01-27 Thread joe cypherpunk
HTML manuals are working fine with your updated version. That seems to have fixed it. Thanks for the quick work! On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Tom Callaway wrote: > On 01/26/2016 04:43 PM, Tom Callaway wrote: > > On 01/21/2016 10:38 AM, joe cypherpunk wrote: > >> R help.start() opens a we

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] html manual files nonfunctional

2016-01-27 Thread Tom Callaway
On 01/26/2016 04:43 PM, Tom Callaway wrote: > On 01/21/2016 10:38 AM, joe cypherpunk wrote: >> R help.start() opens a web browser as expected, but the “Manual” html links >> are dead (although the “Reference” and “Miscellaneous Materials” html links >> do work). I get a similar problem from within