Re: [R-sig-Fedora] R 4.0.0 rebuild status

2020-07-21 Thread Iñaki Ucar
On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 at 17:05, José Abílio Matos wrote: > > On Friday, 3 July 2020 18.36.17 WEST Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > Nice! What if we create a group "R" on Pagure and a repo > > "fedora-scripts" or something like that? > > I would like to improve the scripts but FWIW here it comes a rough version

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] Problem with the update to R 4.0.2 in the Fedora users' list

2020-07-21 Thread Tom Callaway
I'm inclined to agree. Users are expecting that things they install manually will override the system default (if any). Tom On Tue, Jul 21, 2020, 11:39 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote: > On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 at 17:17, José Abílio Matos wrote: > > > > There was a thread this weekend in the fedora users' mai

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] Problem with the update to R 4.0.2 in the Fedora users' list

2020-07-21 Thread Iñaki Ucar
On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 at 17:17, José Abílio Matos wrote: > > There was a thread this weekend in the fedora users' mailing list where a user > had problems updating R 4.0.2: > > "non-rpm R libraries not accessible now w R v 4.0.x" > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/us...@lists.fedoraproj

[R-sig-Fedora] Problem with the update to R 4.0.2 in the Fedora users' list

2020-07-21 Thread José Abílio Matos
There was a thread this weekend in the fedora users' mailing list where a user had problems updating R 4.0.2: "non-rpm R libraries not accessible now w R v 4.0.x" https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/us...@lists.fedoraproject.org/ thread/2FFST3GWZCNM45SX53VKB255TO4LOV4C/ TLDR; as far as

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] R 4.0.0 rebuild status

2020-07-21 Thread José Abílio Matos
On Friday, 3 July 2020 18.36.17 WEST Iñaki Ucar wrote: > Nice! What if we create a group "R" on Pagure and a repo > "fedora-scripts" or something like that? I would like to improve the scripts but FWIW here it comes a rough version of the script I used. The python script loads the csv file and c