Re: [R-sig-Fedora] Fwd: new packages needed

2021-06-16 Thread Elliott Sales de Andrade
I've already packaged both of those, but haven't had a chance to update shiny because I couldn't figure out https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936222 Though I don't understand why you do version bumps in a mass rebuild; that seems like more work than necessary. On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 at 1

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] Fwd: new packages needed

2021-06-16 Thread Tom Callaway
I do not think it is required now, but it might be in the near term. Then again, it might be required now, and I just haven't hit it yet. ~spot On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 10:49 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote: > On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 at 16:08, Tom Callaway wrote: > > > > because it is already one of those days

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] Fwd: new packages needed

2021-06-16 Thread Iñaki Ucar
On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 at 16:08, Tom Callaway wrote: > > because it is already one of those days and i didn't hit reply all. :/ > > ~spot > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Tom Callaway > Date: Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 10:02 AM > Subject: Re: [R-sig-Fedora] new packages needed > To: Iñak

[R-sig-Fedora] Fwd: new packages needed

2021-06-16 Thread Tom Callaway
because it is already one of those days and i didn't hit reply all. :/ ~spot -- Forwarded message - From: Tom Callaway Date: Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 10:02 AM Subject: Re: [R-sig-Fedora] new packages needed To: Iñaki Ucar shiny (not covr, that was my brain spitting out the wrong t