On Wed, 23 Jun 2021 at 19:00, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
>
> In rawhide, there may be some "glitches", because it's in active
> development, so I have to launch several mass rebuilds until things
> start to settle (no more system-wide changes, no more core library
> updates...). Right now I'm in the middle
On Wed, 23 Jun 2021 at 18:29, Gavin Simpson wrote:
>
> Thanks Iñaki! toolbox looks really useful for my usecase.
Toolbox is *very* cool. :)
> I'm hitting a related issue in that some R-* packages are not up-to-date with
> their CRAN versions (especially testthat, which won't compile on F35/rawh
FWIW, I just built R-testthat-3.0.3 in rawhide.
As far as the R-* packages in the repos, they are either an R package that
someone wanted in Fedora at some point (10%), a package that needed some
love to build in Fedora, either because it is old or Fedora is too new
(5%), BioConductor bits (10%),
Thanks Iñaki! toolbox looks really useful for my usecase.
I'm hitting a related issue in that some R-* packages are not up-to-date
with their CRAN versions (especially testthat, which won't compile on
F35/rawhide because of a problem in catch that is bundled with testhat and
something that has cha
On Wed, 23 Jun 2021 at 14:50, Gavin Simpson wrote:
>
> How would one go about installing R 4.1 from rawhide? (October is a little
> too far away to be off r-release for that long while maintaining R packages
> on CRAN that depend on tidyverse packages.)
$ sudo dnf update R --release rawhide
sh
How would one go about installing R 4.1 from rawhide? (October is a little
too far away to be off r-release for that long while maintaining R packages
on CRAN that depend on tidyverse packages.)
TIA
Gavin
On Fri, 18 Jun 2021 at 14:21, Tom Callaway wrote:
> I don't think so. If Fedora 34 users
We still have a few issues:
# dnf install R-*
Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:08 ago on Tue Jun 22 13:04:20 2021.
Error:
Problem 1: conflicting requests
- nothing provides R(ABI) = 4.0 needed by R-littler-0.3.12-2.fc34.x86_64
Problem 2: conflicting requests
- nothing provides R(ABI) = 4.0 n
I don't think so. If Fedora 34 users want R 4.1, they can install it from
rawhide.
Or someone that isn't me can spend another two weeks doing it. :)
~spot
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021, 6:50 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> Nice! Plans for F34? :))
>
> On Fri, 18 Jun 2021 at 00:45, Tom Callaway wrote:
> >
> > T
Nice! Plans for F34? :))
On Fri, 18 Jun 2021 at 00:45, Tom Callaway wrote:
>
> The R 4.1 rawhide rebuild is complete, and waiting for bodhi to push it:
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-e7a89430cd
>
> ~spot
--
Iñaki Úcar
___
R-S
The R 4.1 rawhide rebuild is complete, and waiting for bodhi to push it:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-e7a89430cd
~spot
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
___
R-SIG-Fedora mailing list
R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org
https://
RStudio built and update submitted:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-7a6c7fd1c1
Iñaki
On Mon, 7 Jun 2021 at 19:53, Tom Callaway wrote:
>
> I have started the R 4.1.0 build process in rawhide. The side tag is
> f35-build-side-42293.
>
> I'm tracking things using a Google Shee
I have started the R 4.1.0 build process in rawhide. The side tag is
f35-build-side-42293.
I'm tracking things using a Google Sheet, if anyone wants access, just let
me know.
~spot
On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 4:11 PM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Jun 2021 at 20:12, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> >
> > I've u
On Sat, 5 Jun 2021 at 20:12, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
>
> I've updated RStudio to 1.4.1717, which supports R 4.1, and builds are
> underway [2, 3, 4]. This may take a while (s390x didn't even start
> yet).
Oh, planned outage: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9960
--
Iñaki Úcar
__
Find attached an ordered build list, one batch per line (Bioc packages
are included). I've pushed the script to [1]. I believe José had more
scripts from the last mass rebuild. If you want to push them too, I
believe (all three of) you should have commit access.
I've updated RStudio to 1.4.1717, w
On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 at 16:08, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
>
> This seems like a good opportunity to give this a go:
> https://github.com/juhp/fbrnch#parallel-building
>
I did ask for some enhancements for bootstrap builds there, but I
don't know how well it works yet. Also, I'm not too sure it
understands
This seems like a good opportunity to give this a go:
https://github.com/juhp/fbrnch#parallel-building
On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 at 21:59, Tom Callaway wrote:
> That is a very good point. Oh well. Anyone want to help generate the build
> order? :)
>
> ~spot
>
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2021, 3:57 PM Elliott Sale
That is a very good point. Oh well. Anyone want to help generate the build
order? :)
~spot
On Fri, Jun 4, 2021, 3:57 PM Elliott Sales de Andrade <
quantum.anal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri., Jun. 4, 2021, 10:08 a.m. Tom Callaway, wrote:
>
>> Is there a way to know which R components provide gr
On Fri., Jun. 4, 2021, 10:08 a.m. Tom Callaway, wrote:
> Is there a way to know which R components provide graphics drivers? I would
> really rather not rebuild everything if we do not have to.
>
>
Unless you mean rebuild for testing purposes, because you added the R(ABI)
= major.minor Provides/R
Is there a way to know which R components provide graphics drivers? I would
really rather not rebuild everything if we do not have to.
~spot
On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 6:28 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> On Sat, 22 May 2021 at 22:18, José Abílio Matos wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> > what should be our plan
On Sat, 22 May 2021 at 22:18, José Abílio Matos wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> what should be our plan for R 4.1 update in Fedora?
See [1]. The plan is to wait for the next RStudio release and
coordinate updates.
[1] https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-fedora/2021-May/000736.html
> What are the pitf
Hi all,
what should be our plan for R 4.1 update in Fedora?
What are the pitfalls and the changes that we should be aware?
The second semester (with the corresponding induced pandemic chaos) is
dimming down around here so I have at least time to breath again. :-)
FWIW I am in no hurry to
21 matches
Mail list logo
