Hi Adrian,
One followup I can't find answered in the book -- is there an analogue to
the isotropic edge correction in kest.fft? Or does it only do border?
Thanks!
Nick
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 10:58 AM Nick Eubank wrote:
> Great, thanks so much for taking the time to answer this Adrian! And fo
Great, thanks so much for taking the time to answer this Adrian! And for
the book link!
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 3:25 AM Adrian Baddeley <
adrian.badde...@curtin.edu.au> wrote:
> Nick Eubank writes:
>
>
> > Using `kest` to estimate a ripley's K for a country.
>
> This is a question about the 'spat
Nick Eubank writes:
> Using `kest` to estimate a ripley's K for a country.
This is a question about the 'spatstat' package.
The function name is 'Kest'.
> The authors of the package suggest isotropic is best when computationally
> tractable for
> irregular shapes, but I noticed in Ripley (1988
Hi All,
Using `kest` to estimate a ripley's K for a country. The authors of the
package suggest isotropic is best when computationally tractable for
irregular shapes, but I noticed in Ripley (1988) that this correction is
only "unbiased provided E is convex", where E is the boundaries of study.
