Re: [R-sig-Geo] Spatial partitioning of direct, indirect and total impacts (2)

2014-08-07 Thread Janka VANSCHOENWINKEL
Thank you very much Roger! That works perfectly! 2014-08-06 13:08 GMT+02:00 Roger Bivand roger.biv...@nhh.no: On Wed, 6 Aug 2014, Janka VANSCHOENWINKEL wrote: Dear list members, I am sorry that I am going to repeat my question. I do not want to insist, but since I sent it right before

[R-sig-Geo] Spatial partitioning of direct, indirect and total impacts (2)

2014-08-06 Thread Janka VANSCHOENWINKEL
Dear list members, I am sorry that I am going to repeat my question. I do not want to insist, but since I sent it right before the weekend, the timing was probably not so good and I thought it would be good to give it a second chance. I am trying to reproduce table 2.1 (p. 41) of LeSage and Pace

Re: [R-sig-Geo] Spatial partitioning of direct, indirect and total impacts (2)

2014-08-06 Thread Roger Bivand
On Wed, 6 Aug 2014, Janka VANSCHOENWINKEL wrote: Dear list members, I am sorry that I am going to repeat my question. I do not want to insist, but since I sent it right before the weekend, the timing was probably not so good and I thought it would be good to give it a second chance. I am

[R-sig-Geo] Spatial partitioning of direct, indirect and total impacts

2014-08-01 Thread Janka VANSCHOENWINKEL
Dear list members, I am trying to reproduce table 2.1 (p. 41) of LeSage and Pace (2009). This is a table containing the direct, indirect and total impacts of a SAR model (since the regression coefficients cannot be interpreted directly because of spillovers), *partitioned by W-order*. I am able