Antonio Manuel Moreno Ródenas wrote:
> Thanks a lot Edzer,
>
> I'm not sure that would work.
> In that way I would transfer to the kriging function the averaged value
> of the covariate in the block. I'm not sure that would make the kriging
> behave correctly.
>
> All the points calculated
On 13/01/16 15:01, Antonio Manuel Moreno R�denas wrote:
> Thanks a lot Edzer,
>
> I'm not sure that would work.
> In that way I would transfer to the kriging function the averaged value
> of the covariate in the block. I'm not sure that would make the kriging
> behave correctly.
>
> All the points
On 14/01/16 12:35, Bruin, Sytze de wrote:
> I believe the residual variogram should then be computed using the covariate
> data at block support.
>
> Sytze de Bruin
> Wageningen University
> Laboratory of Geo-Information Science and Remote Sensing
why?
--
Edzer Pebesma
Institute for Geoinfo
On 14/01/16 12:35, Bruin, Sytze de wrote:
> I believe the residual variogram should then be computed using the covariate
> data at block support.
>
> Sytze de Bruin
> Wageningen University
> Laboratory of Geo-Information Science and Remote Sensing
why?
--
Edzer Pebesma
Institute for Geoinformatic
Hello, I would like to rise a question on the use of predict {gstat},
I'm trying to perform the estimation of a spatially distributed variable at
the support scale of a particular area (Block kriging). I have access to an
additional variable, it is known that the variable of interest is
correlated
On 13/01/16 14:16, Antonio Manuel Moreno Ródenas wrote:
> Hello, I would like to rise a question on the use of predict {gstat},
>
> I'm trying to perform the estimation of a spatially distributed variable at
> the support scale of a particular area (Block kriging). I have access to an
> addition
Thanks a lot Edzer,
I'm not sure that would work.
In that way I would transfer to the kriging function the averaged value of
the covariate in the block. I'm not sure that would make the kriging behave
correctly.
All the points calculated with the prediction inside the block (and later
averaged to
On 13/01/16 15:01, Antonio Manuel Moreno Ródenas wrote:
> Thanks a lot Edzer,
>
> I'm not sure that would work.
> In that way I would transfer to the kriging function the averaged value
> of the covariate in the block. I'm not sure that would make the kriging
> behave correctly.
>
> All the po
Hi all,
Am 13.01.2016 um 15:31 schrieb Edzer Pebesma:
> I think so, when the operations (computing the drift, and block
> averaging) are both linear, it does not matter in which order they are
> carried out: f(g(x)) = g(f(x)).
... which seems to be one of the messages of this paper:
@article{tit
