Roger,
Works for me now. Thanks for your patience with this.
I'll definitely look at sf for future projects, but for now, I just want to
analyze my darn data! :)
- Anne
On 05/01/2017 05:23 AM, Roger Bivand wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Apr 2017, Anne C. Hanna wrote:
>
>> Okay, I think I've tracked
On Sun, 30 Apr 2017, Anne C. Hanna wrote:
Okay, I think I've tracked it down. This is... absurdly complicated and I
don't know what the actual correct resolution is, but I'm pretty sure that at
least I know what's going wrong.
Good, and thanks for staying with this. I've pushed a fix to my
Okay, I think I've tracked it down. This is... absurdly complicated and I
don't know what the actual correct resolution is, but I'm pretty sure that at
least I know what's going wrong.
Basically it comes down to the fact that createSPComment() does not actually
check whether each individual
Roger,
Unfortunately I have a use case for you of createSPComment() not working.
I tried your new version of disaggregate() on the original test script I sent
you, and it does seem to have fixed all the cases in there. However, when I
tried it on my actual data, it had the same failure mode as
On Sat, 29 Apr 2017, Anne C. Hanna wrote:
Roger,
This looks great, and I will try it out ASAP. I do have one reservation
though --- it seems you are using createSPComment() to reconstruct the
comments, and I have seen some discussion that that may not be reliable
in all cases (e.g. if the
Roger,
This looks great, and I will try it out ASAP. I do have one reservation
though --- it seems you are using createSPComment() to reconstruct the
comments, and I have seen some discussion that that may not be reliable in all
cases (e.g. if the initial polygons are wonky in some way). I
I've pushed the fix to my fork:
https://github.com/rsbivand/sp
and created a pull request:
https://github.com/edzer/sp/pull/28
Only one part of a complicated set if nested if() in disaggregate() was
adding comments, but in some settings the existing comments survived the
disaggregation. Now
