Karl,
When you reduce the cell sizes, are you increasing the cell dims
proportionally, otherwise you will get what you are saying?
Roger
On Fri, 9 Jun 2006, Edzer J. Pebesma wrote:
> Karl, I cannot reproduce your problem:
>
> library(sp)
> grd <- GridTopology(c(617400, 6190060), c(.5,.5), c(
Karl, I cannot reproduce your problem:
library(sp)
grd <- GridTopology(c(617400, 6190060), c(.5,.5), c(400, 300))
grdx = SpatialGridDataFrame(grd, data = data.frame(z= 1:12))
spplot(grdx, col.regions=bpy.colors())
shows exactly what I expected.
--
Edzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Yes, the gr
Yes, the grid coordinates reflect the c(0,5, 0,5)
[1,] 617400.0 6190061.0
[2,] 617400.5 6190061.0
[3,] 617401.0 6190061.0
[4,] 617401.5 6190061.0
[5,] 617400.0 6190060.5
[6,] 617400.5 6190060.5
But for some reason, when using the smaller cellsize my spplot of the
interpolated field all of
On Fri, 9 Jun 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> after some fiddling with the GridTopology() method I eventually succeeded
> in making it work and now can interpolate onto the grid.
>
> Tremendous, thanks.
Good
>
> One problem I encountered when specifying a number smaller than 1 for the
> cel
after some fiddling with the GridTopology() method I eventually succeeded
in making it work and now can interpolate onto the grid.
Tremendous, thanks.
One problem I encountered when specifying a number smaller than 1 for the
cellsize argument eg. c(0.5, 0.5) instead of c(1,1), I get erroneous
r
