On Mon, 13 Nov 2006, Raphael Saldanha wrote:
> Thanks Roger! I'm just making some tests with the method
>
> Take a look below, this is what I have.
>
> > summary(lm(V03 ~ V04 + V05, as.data.frame(x)))
>
> Call:
> lm(formula = V03 ~ V04 + V05, data = as.data.frame(x))
>
> Residuals:
> Min
Thanks Roger! I'm just making some tests with the method
Take a look below, this is what I have.
> summary(lm(V03 ~ V04 + V05, as.data.frame(x)))
Call:
lm(formula = V03 ~ V04 + V05, data = as.data.frame(x))
Residuals:
Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
-5.909 -3.855 -3.380 -2.694 185.
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006, Raphael Saldanha wrote:
> The best way to export the results to a shapefile is:
>
> writePolyShape(res.adpt$SDF, "nameshape")
Yes, it should work, unless there are questions about the values output by
gwr().
Roger
>
> Is not?
>
>
--
Roger Bivand
Economic Geography Se
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006, Raphael Saldanha wrote:
> Help!
>
> In the SDF results, what exactly means these fields:
>
> sum_w
> X.Intercept
> V04
> V05
> X1
> X2
> X3
The spgwr package is not really intended to help people use GWR, which is
not generally accepted as a technique of analysis (because i
The best way to export the results to a shapefile is:
writePolyShape(res.adpt$SDF, "nameshape")
Is not?
--
Atenciosamente,
Raphael Saldanha
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
O conteúdo desta mensagem eletrônica, incluindo seus anexos, é
conf
Help!
In the SDF results, what exactly means these fields:
sum_w
X.Intercept
V04
V05
X1
X2
X3
I'm using this code:
> x <- readShapePoly("domicilio_3136702.shp", IDvar = "ID_")
> x.adapt.gauss <- gwr.sel(V03 ~ V06 + V07 + V08, data=x, adapt=TRUE)
> res.adpt <- gwr(V03 ~ V06 + V07 + V08, data=x,
Some articles:
>From fields to objects: A review of geographic boundary analysis
http://www.springerlink.com/content/q1kxcfqegmrmjv92/
Integrating Edge Detection and Dynamic Modeling in Quantitative Analyses of
Ecological Boundaries
http://www.bioone.org/perlserv/?request=get-abstract&issn=0006-
