I agree GEOS support would be welcome. I'd be happy to help out if
anyone takes this on.
I've been thinking of a possibly quicker (devel time) solution lately
since I've been using PostGIS a lot. One could have a postgis package
that copies 'sp' object into postgis and then provides postgis
functi
In my opinion the first item on the agenda should be to
get good documentation in place including many examples.
On 3/16/07, Edzer J. Pebesma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Although I'm interested many of the issues below, and also feel the
> attraction of the develop-it-ourself, my personal agenda
Although I'm interested many of the issues below, and also feel the
attraction of the develop-it-ourself, my personal agenda is a bit more
modest. Once we start with GEOS support (an idea mentioned every 6
months on this list), the next thing we need for dealing with huge or
massive data sets i
On 3/16/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > My OSGeo summer of code idea is to link the BGL to postgis. I wasn't
> > originally thinking about topology per se, but it would achieve much the
> > same thing.
>
>
> I've thought a bit about this project, too, as it butts up against
> My OSGeo summer of code idea is to link the BGL to postgis. I wasn't
> originally thinking about topology per se, but it would achieve much the
> same thing.
I've thought a bit about this project, too, as it butts up against some of
my own work.
My experience with graph libraries has not
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The thread below and many others in R-sig-Geo raise questions about
> future directions. In reinventing GIS there are a whole list of
> capabilities and functions that would be helpful. Some that I have
> noticed include,
>
> Topological representa
Denis,
I was just about to reply to Nicholas that my ideal solution would be
to build a graph data structure linking adjacent elements and find the
the hull that way -- I think you saw the solution before I did. (I'm
starting to grok that all of this is already well known in the vector
GIS world w
The thread below and many others in R-sig-Geo raise questions about
future directions. In reinventing GIS there are a whole list of
capabilities and functions that would be helpful. Some that I have
noticed include,
Topological representation to enable
Planar enforcement of boundary integr