7-9671.2006.01015.x
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: r-sig-geo-boun...@stat.math.ethz.ch
>> [mailto:r-sig-geo-boun...@stat.math.ethz.ch] On Behalf
>> Of Edzer Pebesma
>> Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 9:08 AM
>> To: Yong Li
>> Cc: r-sig-ge
-geo-boun...@stat.math.ethz.ch] On Behalf
> Of Edzer Pebesma
> Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 9:08 AM
> To: Yong Li
> Cc: r-sig-geo@stat.math.ethz.ch
> Subject: Re: [R-sig-Geo] FW: Interpolcation option: IDW or OK?
>
> Yong Li wrote:
> > Hi Edzer,
> >
> > I would say t
Yong Li wrote:
Hi Edzer,
I would say the spatial structure is regarded not significant when c0/c0+c1 is
very much greater than 75%. In my case I used even distance intervals and
calculated c0/c0+c1 for log(OLSENP) greater than 85%. I knew this index
sometimes is very fragile, very much depend
Hi Edzer,
I would say the spatial structure is regarded not significant when c0/c0+c1 is
very much greater than 75%. In my case I used even distance intervals and
calculated c0/c0+c1 for log(OLSENP) greater than 85%. I knew this index
sometimes is very fragile, very much depending on how we fit
