> Depends on your GIS! Shapefiles only have a 1-1 relationship, but
> that's because they are a bit rubbish. If you use a proper spatial
> database then you can do one-many. This is an application for a
> PostGIS or Spatialite database, and if your GIS can read that (Qgis
> for example) then you a
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 6:16 AM, Noli Sicad wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have problem transposing my database table which is to be merged /
> joined with the shapefile file (*.dbf) inorder to have one-to-one
> relationship with shapefile polygon. As we know that inorder for the
> polygon to be rendered in GI
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010, Noli Sicad wrote:
Review ?reshape to convert to wide format before trying to merge into
your object for using spplot().
Roger
OK. The answer is not possible.
I have been studying reshape - cast and melt. The illustration submit
in my earlier post, can be easily done. But
> Review ?reshape to convert to wide format before trying to merge into
> your object for using spplot().
>
> Roger
OK. The answer is not possible.
I have been studying reshape - cast and melt. The illustration submit
in my earlier post, can be easily done. But here is the real data
(below) is b
On Wed, 6 Jan 2010, Noli Sicad wrote:
Hi,
I have problem transposing my database table which is to be merged /
joined with the shapefile file (*.dbf) inorder to have one-to-one
relationship with shapefile polygon. As we know that inorder for the
polygon to be rendered in GIS, it has to have one
Hi,
I have problem transposing my database table which is to be merged /
joined with the shapefile file (*.dbf) inorder to have one-to-one
relationship with shapefile polygon. As we know that inorder for the
polygon to be rendered in GIS, it has to have one-to-ope relationship.
One to many table:
