David,
thank you. it works.
Where is it documented? I want to set the depth to something much larger
than 10.
I don't see anything about the stack on the ?quartz page
and there appears not to be any control option on the quartz menu item on
the device
itself.
Rich
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 11:35
On Jul 4, 2012, at 11:12 PM, Richard M. Heiberger wrote:
The windows feature I miss most on the Mac is a graphics device that
remembers the previous graphs,
specifically
windows.options(record=TRUE) ## R for Windows
Is there a similar feature available on the macintosh?
There is a graphics
The windows feature I miss most on the Mac is a graphics device that
remembers the previous graphs,
specifically
windows.options(record=TRUE) ## R for Windows
Is there a similar feature available on the macintosh?
Rich
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
__
On 04/07/2012 08:35, peter dalgaard wrote:
On Jul 4, 2012, at 03:12 , Michael Braun wrote:
I just upgraded to R 2.15.1, and I am getting a segmentation fault
when using the rWishart function (from the stats package) to sample
moderately-size matrices.
Here is the output when I run R within gd
It's not a Mac issue (except perhaps the crash).
The author of rWishart used alloca() without checking if there is space
available on the stack. For large enough arrays that blows the stack
and although R can tell you that has happened, the damage has been done.
We'll fix that shortly, so ta
On Jul 4, 2012, at 03:12 , Michael Braun wrote:
> I just upgraded to R 2.15.1, and I am getting a segmentation fault when using
> the rWishart function (from the stats package) to sample moderately-size
> matrices.
>
> Here is the output when I run R within gdb. 720 appears to be the
> dimen
