Re: [R-sig-phylo] estimating the evolutionary rate of a continous trait

2016-04-20 Thread Emmanuel Paradis
Hi Manabu & Belinda, In fact, the (homogeneous) OU process makes the data look like with no phylogenetic correlation since the covariance between species decreases exponentially with time and the value of alpha. I think the two situations (a trait not evolving on a phylogeny and following a no

Re: [R-sig-phylo] Testing different topological hypotheses - based on taxonomic treatments

2016-04-20 Thread Matthews, Luke
I wanted to second Jacob Berv's suggestions about Bayes Factors for testing apriori hypotheses about tree topology. Here are two papers that show worked out examples of this approach, and discuss some of the checks you need to do before proceeding. For example, you want to be sure the character

Re: [R-sig-phylo] estimating the evolutionary rate of a continous trait

2016-04-20 Thread Manabu Sakamoto
Hi Belinda, Sorry to jump in on this a bit late, but I thought maybe we need to step back to basics first? Since lambda=~0, this indicates strongly that your data has almost no phylogenetic signal; most of the variation in data is at the tips = noisy with respect to phylogeny. In which case, I fi