e@wisc.edu>>
Sendt: 3. september 2019 01:04
Til: r-sig-phylo@r-project.org<mailto:r-sig-phylo@r-project.org>
mailto:r-sig-phylo@r-project.org>>; Søren Faurby
mailto:soren.fau...@bios.au.dk>>
Emne: Re: [R-sig-phylo] Odd behavior of phylogenetic regressions
I suspect t
nelli-lab.net/>
Fra: Cecile Ane
Sendt: 3. september 2019 01:04
Til: r-sig-phylo@r-project.org ; Søren Faurby
Emne: Re: [R-sig-phylo] Odd behavior of phylogenetic regressions
I suspect that “Climbing” and “Rainforest” are correlated with each other, so
one of both lose significance when both
I suspect that “Climbing” and “Rainforest” are correlated with each other, so
one of both lose significance when both are included in the model.
Also, the Wald-type tests in logistic regression are not exact, and they
typically give a different p-value than a likelihood ratio test. Both Wald
te
Dear list,
I am currently working on a project looking at the predictors of spinyness in
palms
Spinyness is coded binary. I have a number of potential predictors and want to
identify the best set of predictors. I am using "phyloglm" from the "phylolm"
package.
I am currently using the method=