Since no one else has answered, I'll jump in as a Racketeer using Homebrew.

I currently use the "cask" of Racket, but I did formerly use the
"minimal-racket" package. I had no need for the minimalism, but one thing I
liked about it is that (IIRC) it set the console-bin for Racket launchers
to something consistent across releases (maybe /usr/local ?).

With the cask version, Homebrew symlinks racket, raco, etc into /usr/local,
but command-line tools added by packages go into /Applications/Racket
v6.9/bin, which means I still have to remember to edit my PATH when I
install a new version of Racket. (Or perhaps there's some environment
variable I don't know about to set such things?)

In an ideal world, I'd really like Homebrew to manage configuring my PATH,
migrating installed packages, etc. automatically. (Perhaps something closer
to the "Unix-style" option from the Linux/Unix installer script.) Of
course, in practice I'm only reminded of this every few months when upgrade
time comes, vaguely think I should figure out a better solution, and then
forget about it …

-Philip

On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Vincent St-Amour <
stamo...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote:

> All,
>
> I've been noticing a number of people reporting issues related to the
> `minimal-racket` Homebrew formula, for Mac OS.
>
> In particular, package installation seems at least partially broken.
> The larger issue, though, is that, as far as I can tell, this formula
> is not actively maintained.
>
> Fortunately for Racketeers who like to use Homebrew, there also exists a
> "cask" (pre-built package) for Racket, built using the installers
> produced by the Racket team. To the best of my knowledge, this version
> works fine.
>
> So my question to Racket-via-Homebrew users is: is the cask sufficient
> for your purposes? If so, I'll ask the Homebrew maintainers to remove
> the broken `minimal-racket` formula. If not, and you would be interested
> in taking over its maintenance, I can add you keep you in the loop
> regarding Racket releases.
>
> Please let me know what you think.
>
> Vincent
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Racket Developers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to racket-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to racket-dev@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/
> msgid/racket-dev/m2shk0ijgk.wl-stamourv%40eecs.northwestern.edu.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to racket-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to racket-dev@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/CAH3z3gZuSeF-T2nLm%3DTRYHkvYm-W2Tc5-n0rJqZ2aBnXLhP8Gw%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to