At Wed, 12 Jul 2017 17:25:58 -0400, Leif Andersen wrote:
> It looks like this is what the docs have to say wrt making tests pass:
> ```
> Distribute Native Libraries
>
> Another option is to build a 64-bit Linux version of the library,
> distribute it as a package, and make the package a platform-
It looks like this is what the docs have to say wrt making tests pass:
```
Distribute Native Libraries
Another option is to build a 64-bit Linux version of the library,
distribute it as a package, and make the package a platform-specific
dependency of your package for the "x86_64-linux-natipkg" pl
At 12 Jul 2017 16:43:48 -0400, "'John Clements' via Racket Developers" wrote:
> I have a bunch of packages that fail because they depend on external
> libraries, viz: GLPK, which depends on the glpk library. It’s listed
> as having failing tests, because (not surprisingly) it won’t run
> without th
> On Jul 12, 2017, at 17:50, Jay McCarthy wrote:
>
> Yup, we may do that eventually, but we won't start spamming without
> permission.
I have a bunch of packages that fail because they depend on external libraries,
viz: GLPK, which depends on the glpk library. It’s listed as having failing
t
Yup, we may do that eventually, but we won't start spamming without permission.
Jay
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> In case anyone is as mentally slow as I am right after lunch: I think this
> is the gray button labeled like: "515 todos. Click here to see them."
>
> Woul
In case anyone is as mentally slow as I am right after lunch: I think
this is the gray button labeled like: "515 todos. Click here to see them."
Would it be good to have an automated monthly email to package owners,
itemizing the issues with each of their packages? (Each email address
would g
If you go to the package site now, then every package table will tell
you how many of the packages shown have some sort of flaw. The flaws
are: failing to build, tests failing, missing documentation, missing
tags, or missing a description. (We need to fix it a little bit
because some packages aren'
