On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 11:28 AM Matthew Flatt wrote:
> I would also highlight that the web
> server change is technically not backward-compatible.
>
…
> * The Web Server provides fine-grained control over various aspects of
>handling client connections (timeouts, buffer sizes, maximum hea
My preferences are "more responsive" for scrolling, the scrolling
bullet first, "improved" for dark-mode support, the Racket CS bullet
third so that the DrRacket items stay together, and "The Web Server"
instead of "The PLT Web Server". I would also highlight that the web
server change is technical
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 10:07 AM Matthew Flatt wrote:
>
> At Mon, 27 Jan 2020 09:37:12 -0600, Robby Findler wrote:
> > [...] there is a problem on windows that makes
> > many of them moot (because we cannot seem to reliably detect when the
> > OS is in dark mode). So, IMO, the external perspective
At Mon, 27 Jan 2020 09:37:12 -0600, Robby Findler wrote:
> [...] there is a problem on windows that makes
> many of them moot (because we cannot seem to reliably detect when the
> OS is in dark mode). So, IMO, the external perspective is probably
> that things are better on non-windows platforms ov
I'm happy with either order wrt to CS and scrolling. Matthew did most
of both of them so perhaps his opinion would be useful.
Robby
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 9:43 AM Matthias Felleisen
wrote:
>
>
> @ John, almost all in one place:
>
> ~~ most suggested fixed incorporated.
> ~~ not incorporated: ch
Thanks Robby,
Is that the reason why I still don't get full "dark mode" that was
discussed in the thread (
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/racket-users/3GgHnr6IurQ) even in
the latest 7.6.0.6--2020-01-27(c48afdb/a) snapshot build?
--JC
On Monday, January 27, 2020 at 9:37:26 AM UTC-6, R
@ John, almost all in one place:
~~ most suggested fixed incorporated.
~~ not incorporated: changing the name of the executable.
~~ not incorporated: Robby’s request to move scrolling up.
~~ bracketed the last bullet; I think it could be dropped.
The final decisions are yours. — Matthias
There are aspects of the improvement that are in cross-platform code
(most of them in fact) but there is a problem on windows that makes
many of them moot (because we cannot seem to reliably detect when the
OS is in dark mode). So, IMO, the external perspective is probably
that things are better on
On 1/27/20 4:01 PM, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
Typos fixed.
* Racket CS is ready for production use. We will work to further improve
Racket CS before making it the default implementation, but it now
consistently passes all of our integration tests and generally performs
well. (Compiled co
Is the dark mode improvement on Windows or Linux? This announcement says
it's Windows, but
https://github.com/racket/drracket/commit/30c8a437f5ccf098d7c0a871095db927fe9462ea
says
it's Linux.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 7:01 AM Matthias Felleisen
wrote:
>
> Typos fixed.
>
>
> * Racket CS is ready for
Typos fixed.
* Racket CS is ready for production use. We will work to further improve
Racket CS before making it the default implementation, but it now
consistently passes all of our integration tests and generally performs
well. (Compiled code remains significantly larger compared to the d
Hi Folks,
SQLite is very flexible and lots of features can be enabled at compile
time. I was wondering if the following extensions could be enabled for the
next release:
# FTS5
A new full-text search extension.
more info at: https://www.sqlite.org/fts5.html
# JSON1
Enable JSON features inside S
On 1/26/20 8:19 AM, 'John Clements' via dev-redirect wrote:
The release announcement sketch that I have so far is below. Please
mail me new items and/or edits.
Please phrase announcements using complete sentences and avoid the
word "now".
---
13 matches
Mail list logo
