Re: [racket-dev] Fwd: [racket/racket] Run failed: CI Linux - release (87bd7b1)

2020-07-19 Thread Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
The problem here is that the release branch is built the same way the master branch is, by checking out the latest Chez Scheme from GitHub. But that's wrong for the release branch, which isn't tracking that, as you note. Really it should probably check out a release branch of Chez Scheme. Sam On

Re: [racket-dev] Fwd: [racket/racket] Run failed: CI Linux - release (87bd7b1)

2020-07-19 Thread Sorawee Porncharoenwase
IIUC, compile-compressed is removed in this commit: https://github.com/racket/ChezScheme/commit/167ac7294a2dc400821e4336f0cfc4de621efe97 Interestingly, the same commit also bumps its version up to 9.5.3.33, while in the release branch, it still requires 9.5.3.32

Re: [racket-dev] Fwd: [racket/racket] Run failed: CI Linux - release (87bd7b1)

2020-07-19 Thread Sorawee Porncharoenwase
I don’t think restarting will help. That error exists in the prior commit as well: https://github.com/racket/racket/runs/874545522 And if I understand correctly, the real error is Exception: variable compile-compressed is not bound Perhaps Chez Scheme version was not up-to-date? On Sun, Jul 19,

Re: [racket-dev] Fwd: [racket/racket] Run failed: CI Linux - release (87bd7b1)

2020-07-19 Thread Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
It looks like the only failed build was Racket CS on Linux with GCC. The error is here https://github.com/racket/racket/runs/886934172#step:8:5614 and doesn't point to anything wrong, so it's not clear what happened. I'll restart those builds and hopefully it won't fail this time. Sam On Sun, Jul

[racket-dev] Fwd: [racket/racket] Run failed: CI Linux - release (87bd7b1)

2020-07-19 Thread 'John Clements' via Racket Developers
Things I should know but don’t (err, sorry): I generally see messages like this when I commit code to the racket repo. My assumption is that the failures I’m seeing in this and related messages are related to problems with the CI infrastructure. Let me know if that’s not the case! Best, John