Without resorting to static analysis, wouldn't a combination of a
stack-as-nursery (e.g. in the style of Gambit Scheme) and one-bit
reference counting (does any implementation use that these days?) help
a lot with the performance of mixing delimited control with more
linear control flows?
—♯ƒ • Fr
Scheme and Functional Programming Workshop 2017
Oxford, United Kingdom
Co-located with ICFP 2017
http://scheme2017.namin.org/
Important Dates
Submission deadline (extended)
June 16th, 2017 (AoE)
Author notification (extended)
July 18th, 2017 (AoE)
Camera-ready deadline (extended)
Aug
Dear Racketeers,
I've started looking into creating a package so that Scribble will
support the new acmart class in its LaTeX backend. I have a few
questions.
0- Who if anyone is maintaining the LaTeX backend to Scribble?
1- How do I insert arbitrary code in the LaTeX output stream, without
an e
The SSL on pkgs.racket-lang.org looks like it's OK after all.
My issue is that I was pulling from the old git repo, and said repo
was in a non-working state that doesn't recognize said the SSL
certificate (in addition to not being the latest racket).
Maybe the old repository at git://git.racket-la
raco pkg install livefrog
Resolving "livefrog" via https://pkgs.racket-lang.org ssl-connect:
connect failed (error:14090086:SSL
routines:SSL3_GET_SERVER_CERTIFICATE:certificate verify failed)
NB: just installed from http://plt.eecs.northwestern.edu/snapshots/
64-bit x86_64 natipkg built on Debian
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Jack Firth wrote:
> I agree with the points about clutter and cumbersome-ness, but I think that
> could be fixed with smarter UI and the like on the package server and
> package installation process. A simple thing to do would be to just have
> multiple packages lik
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> I wouldn't say there is or has been a policy. There's advice based on
> what the release process packages do.
>
> Generally, adding a new export or module is not considered
> incompatibility. (Although technically it is, because it could redu
