Thanks for the summary, this helps us fill in some of the gaps of what
was said before.
gonzalo diethelm wrote at 08/20/2011 11:15 PM:
5. There might be a Racket software engineering book soon, planned by Neil Van
Dyke. I declare myself as a sure customer.
Besides my vaporware book, there
On Saturday, August 20, 2011, gonzalo diethelm wrote:
> I would like to thank everyone for their thoughtful answers. I will try to
summarize a bit and then present my conclusions at the end. One minor note:
I did try to clearly differentiate between Scheme and Racket in my original
post; I am full
I would like to thank everyone for their thoughtful answers. I will try to
summarize a bit and then present my conclusions at the end. One minor note: I
did try to clearly differentiate between Scheme and Racket in my original post;
I am fully aware they are separate and different languages.
1.
It seems to me that Racket would be more widely used if there were database
drivers for major DBMSs (e.g., PostgreSQL, SQLite, MySQL. maybe even Oracle) as
part of the standard distribution. I know there are PLaneT packages available,
but it would sure be easier for potential adopters if they ca
I'm unable to get for/and to typecheck when the body is an application of
'not'. I've tried many variations on the following, without success:
#lang typed/racket
(for/and: : Any ([i (in-range 4)])
(not (my-pred)))
(define (my-pred)
#f)
=>
Type Checker: Expected True, but got Boolean in:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> Check syntax is always running, so you don't need to press the button
> to see binding errors, get the arrows, etc
That is wonderful.
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.ra
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 2:31 AM, Mark Engelberg
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Matthias Felleisen
> wrote:
>> Correction: Scheme (current standard) is the third-best language. Racket is
>> the second-best language.
>
> OK, this is clearly a setup for someone to ask, so I'll ask :)
> Wh
I have not been reading mail diligently, so please forgive me if I'm repeating
something already said, but I'm totally in love with online check syntax,
especially w.r.t. unbound identifiers. A great big huge improvement. Many, many
thanks.
John
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic si
This reminds me of a project I once, some 20 or more years ago, did for
converting SPSS system files from CDC6400 and CDC205 to SPSS system files to
IBM9000. Unfortunately CDC has gone down shortly after. Different word size,
different character encoding etc. Typically these system files were store
9 matches
Mail list logo
