Hello,
I have a 32 bit systems so both Racket and AutoCAD are 32 bits.
I am retrieving the "Layers" property from the AutoCAD "ActiveDocument"
and both of these objects are "com-object".
I can see the available methods in "Layers" using "com-methods".
The method I want to invoke is actually the
Nicely done. Now we just need to win. :)
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Stephen Chang wrote:
> Racket is now installed on the game servers, so you can upload your
> Racket bots. Also, you can get the Racket starter package here:
> http://aichallenge.org/starter_packages.php
>
>
>
> On Sat, N
That is TYPE_E_CANTLOADLIBRARY, and it indicates a problem with the
registered typelib (or lack thereof). Precisely what object are you
retrieving? Are you using win32 mysterx, or win64? Is the retrieved
object win32, or win64?
On 11/28/2011 1:37 AM, José Lopes wrote:
Hello everyone,
I am
Racket is now installed on the game servers, so you can upload your
Racket bots. Also, you can get the Racket starter package here:
http://aichallenge.org/starter_packages.php
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Stephen Chang wrote:
> I ported the python starter package to Racket and submitted a p
Nevermind. Hygiene.
-Ian
- Original Message -
From: "J. Ian Johnson"
To: "users"
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 7:44:21 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: [racket] Abstracting over redex language via macro causes scope issues
Consider the following racket program:
#lang racket
(
On 11/29/11 6:55 PM, Bloch Stephen wrote:
On Nov 29, 2011, at 4:31 PM, David Van Horn wrote:
On 11/29/11 4:28 PM, Jakub Hadam wrote:
Hello,
I claim there is a typo in the online version of HtDP:
Exercise 4.3.3, the first condition should be
[(<=n1000) (*.040n)]
instead of
[(<=n1000) (*.0
Consider the following racket program:
#lang racket
(require redex/reduction-semantics)
(define-language L
[bar natural]
[H (side-condition (name f any) (foo (term f)))])
(define-syntax-rule (foo i) (redex-match L bar i))
This expands just fine. However, try to abstract over L via a macro:
#
Hi Robby,
Many thanks. Thats exactly what I had in mind.
Harry
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Robby Findler
wrote:
> I've pushed a change that makes double-clicking sexp-sensitive. Do let
> me know if it is what you had in mind.
>
> Robby
>
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Neil Van Dyke
>
On Nov 29, 2011, at 4:31 PM, David Van Horn wrote:
On 11/29/11 4:28 PM, Jakub Hadam wrote:
Hello,
I claim there is a typo in the online version of HtDP:
Exercise 4.3.3, the first condition should be
[(<= n 1000) (* .040 n)]
instead of
[(<= n 1000) (* .040 1000)]
Why? That's wha
On 11/29/11 4:28 PM, Jakub Hadam wrote:
Hello,
I claim there is a typo in the online version of HtDP:
Exercise 4.3.3, the first condition should be
[(<= n 1000) (* .040 n)]
instead of
[(<= n 1000) (* .040 1000)]
Why? That's what's in the printed book too and it seems perfectly
re
Hello,
I claim there is a typo in the online version of HtDP:
Exercise 4.3.3, the first condition should be
[(<= n 1000) (* .040 n)]
instead of
[(<= n 1000) (* .040 1000)]
Best regards,
Jakub Hadam
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
htt
I've pushed a change that makes double-clicking sexp-sensitive. Do let
me know if it is what you had in mind.
Robby
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> Harry Spier wrote at 11/15/2011 07:47 PM:
>>
>> What I would find useful is if by mouse clicks you could select text
>> exte
**
* ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium
* on
* Principles of Programming Languages
*
*January 25-27, 2012
* Philadelphia, PA, USA
*
* Call for Particip
LASER Summer School on Software Engineering
Innovative Languages for Software Engineering
September 2-8, 2012 - Elba Island, Italy
http://laser.inf.ethz.ch/2012/
Application deadline: March 15th, 2012
Goals
-
The LASER summer school, organized by the ETH Chair of Software
Engineering
I saw the new db interface and tried it with some trepidation, as I run all my
general ledger applications with Racket programs and MySQL. To my amazement,
after 15 minutes of editing, all of my tests passed on the first go. Great
job, folks! I can't remember a more painless conversion experi
15 matches
Mail list logo
