Sorry -- typo in my code, my last email should read:
OK using define-local-member-name works, see case 1 below, but it
seems it would be much simpler if there was a form define/inheritable
which made the method accessable within the class body where it was
defined and in the sub-class bodies on
Hi everyone,
I've been developing yet another parser generator generator framework
for Racket. Since "yapps" is already taken by another project, I'm
calling this thing "ragg", for Racket AST Generator Generator.
ragg is a parsing framework with the design goal to be easy to use. It
includes the
OK using define-local-member-name works, see case 1 below, but it
seems it would be much simpler if there was a form define/inheritable
which made the method accessable within the class body where it was
defined and in the sub-class bodies only. (see case 2 below)
i.e. no wrapping in a let that ret
On 01/03/2013 05:08 PM, J G Cho wrote:
Postgresql allows
INSERT INTO sal_emp
VALUES ('Bill',
'{1, 1, 1, 1}',
'{{"meeting", "lunch"}, {"training", "presentation"}}');
I have inherited this table that is not quite normalized and has
columns that are expecting arrays
Thanks, Matthew.
Yes, I think make-empty-base-namespace is useful. I'll try it. I was not
aware of its existence. Not needing require in the original namespace allows
me to omit symbol 'require' althogether from my interpreters. Even though
used in quoted form only, it is awkward to have this symbo
Method 1 is better, because it doesn't depend on `require' being bound
in the target namespace. For example, you can start with
`(make-empty-base-namespace)' instead of `(make-empty-namespace)', if
that's useful.
At Thu, 3 Jan 2013 23:22:46 +0100, "Jos Koot" wrote:
> In some cases I want a namespa
In some cases I want a namespace that includes more than racket/base only,
preferably a namespace that includes all of module racket. For example, a
base-namespace does not include procedure force (as clearly documented) I
see two methods to require all of racket into a base-namespace (I imagine
th
On 2013-01-03 17:01:54 -0500, Harry Spier wrote:
> In Racket is it possible to override a non-public method?
>
> [...]
>
> Apologies if I've missed something obvious but I've just started going
> through the Classes and Objects documentation. I can see where you
> can declare a method public and o
Postgresql allows
INSERT INTO sal_emp
VALUES ('Bill',
'{1, 1, 1, 1}',
'{{"meeting", "lunch"}, {"training", "presentation"}}');
I have inherited this table that is not quite normalized and has
columns that are expecting arrays.
Can I do something like following?
(quer
Dear list members,
In Racket is it possible to override a non-public method?
For example in the Racket Guide section 13 and 13.1 it gives this example:
(class object%
(init size); initialization argument
(define current-size size) ; field
(super-new); supe
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 4:51 AM, Yvan Godin wrote:
>
> I don't know if this is the good list for this request but I wanted to see
> Distributed places video, unfortunately seem there is a mismatch with the
> Honu one.
Sorry about that. The video is here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C88L4u306
Yesterday, Sean Kanaley wrote:
>
> My understanding from the linked blog is Racket uses phases so
> e.g. changing functions at REPL like (set! remove-duplicates-by 3)
> that might be used in macros called after this don't use the new
> binding. But if I define a global run-time function, can't it
Hello friends,
is there any Dockwidget capability in Racket gui? Or what about splitter
between panes or something else?
Yours,
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
13 matches
Mail list logo
