Re: [racket] Numbers with dimensions

2013-10-27 Thread Jens Axel Søgaard
In case you need ideas for interesting examples: http://futureboy.us/frinkdocs/#SampleCalculations The Frink language is a DSL for calculating with units. http://futureboy.us/frinkdocs/ /Jens Axe 2013/10/26 Laurent : > Ok, so I just hacked together a small lib for handling numbers with u

[racket] help beta-testing an attempt at a color-blind-friendly DrRacket?

2013-10-27 Thread Robby Findler
The latest snapshot builds for DrRacket include two new color schemes that are an attempt to avoid bad colors for color-blind folk: http://plt.eecs.northwestern.edu/snapshots/ http://www.cs.utah.edu/plt/snapshots/ They are based on Paul Tol's color schemes, specifically the one in the top rig

Re: [racket] Numbers with dimensions

2013-10-27 Thread Laurent
Indeed, the notion of dimension is not really what I was after. My intention was rather to provide a useful unit converter. If my current units are in N, and I multiply by square seconds, I think it's not always desirable for the measure to be automatically converted to m.kg. Currently it does not

Re: [racket] Numbers with dimensions

2013-10-27 Thread Laurent
That's a cool language! Unfortunately time is running short and I don't think I'll do something close to that (and there is actually little chance that I'll use this package myself, so I'm not really committed to it). But I think it's already quite usable. And anyone who wants to contribute or even

[racket] Numerical Optimization in Racket (i.e. Finding Local Minima and Maxima)

2013-10-27 Thread Daniel King
Hi, I've been using R to solve some machine learning problems, but I'd really prefer to use Racket. In order to do so, I need probability distributions, accurate definitions of some mathematical functions like the Gamma and the log of the Gamma function, a decent plotting library, and a numerical

[racket] Confused between strings and symbols

2013-10-27 Thread Bo Gus
If I evaluate this: (list 'this '(is silly)) I get this: '(this (is silly)) I just want to check I understand what is happening here. list always returns a proper list hence I see no dotted notation here. The return value is quoted which means it is a symbol? But there are spaces so can it

Re: [racket] Confused between strings and symbols

2013-10-27 Thread Carl Eastlund
Bo, The quote form wraps fully-evaluated data, so let's peel away the quote around the result and see what you have: (this (is silly)) In quoted data, parentheses mean a list. So you have a list of two elements: this (is silly) The first element is a symbol. The second is a list of two furth

Re: [racket] Confused between strings and symbols

2013-10-27 Thread Neil Van Dyke
First, don't get hung up on that single-quote that you see when the value of that expression is printed. Depending on your DrRacket preferences, the single-quote might not even be printed (it isn't for me). There are 3 different ways that different programs print Racket lists, and each way is

Re: [racket] Confused between strings and symbols

2013-10-27 Thread Matthias Felleisen
You may wish to read through HtDP/2e: http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/matthias/HtDP2e/index.html strings: "silly" symbols: 'silly all lists are made from cons and empty, list quote ' quasiquote ` unquote , are abbreviations that expand to lists: http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/matthias/HtDP2

Re: [racket] help beta-testing an attempt at a color-blind-friendly DrRacket?

2013-10-27 Thread Philip Monk
I'm deuteranomalous, and for me, 44AA99 and AA4499 are nearly identical (AA4499 is ever so slightly darker, but their hues appear identical). Also, 117733 and 882255 are similar, but not identical. I think the main thing is that changing between red and green has very little effect -- changes in b

[racket] Numerical Optimization in Racket (i.e. Finding Local Minima and Maxima)

2013-10-27 Thread Konrad Hinsen
Daniel King writes: > I think Racket has the first three features (the math library looks > awesome), but AFAICT it lacks a numerical optimizer. Has anyone The math library *is* awesome (I have been discovering it myself during the last weeks). The only other source of math/science code I know

Re: [racket] Numbers with dimensions

2013-10-27 Thread Konrad Hinsen
Laurent writes: > Indeed, the notion of dimension is not really what I was after. My intention > was rather > to provide a useful unit converter. Fair enough. > If my current units are in N, and I multiply by square seconds, I > think it's not always desirable for the measure to be automat