Carl,
Don't panic :).
I'm not trying to reuse the expanded syntax at runtime. I'm just trying to
parse it out for my own purposes in the context of a dsl that I fully
control. I'm happy to strip all context and just have a list of symbols if
need-be. My problem is much simpler, in that I wish
Scott,
What you're doing isn't possible -- isn't even meaningful -- in general.
You want to expand (MACRO-NAME (pred-a? z) (pred-b? z)) into (MACRO-NAME
(equal? z "hey") (equal? z "there")) for some arbitrary MACRO-NAME you
haven't listed. That's not at all safe! For instance, you did it with th
I'm trying use local-expand
(
http://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/stxtrans.html?q=local-expand&q=local-expand#%28def._%28%28quote._~23~25kernel%29._local-expand%29%29
)
to partially expand sub-expressions. The only expressions I want to expand
are known in advance, I'm just having trouble comi
On Jan 23, 2014, at 2:38 AM, Patrick Useldinger wrote:
> 2) My (unqualified) first impression is that the OOP layer in Swindle is way
> more powerful than the "standard" OOP layer in Racket. Is there a reason why
> Swindle has not become the standard OOP layer in Racket?
Racket, at the time PL
Hello
I was looking for a CLOS(-like) implementation in Scheme and found that
there is one which is already included in Racket. Before investing some
time into studying this, I have 2 questions:
1) Given that the Swindle docs lack some polish in comparison with the
rest of the modules, are t
5 matches
Mail list logo
