On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Sat, 08 Aug 2015 16:19:23 +0100, Paulo Matos wrote:
>> Where can I find the code for :
>> http://docs.racket-lang.org/search/index.html
>
> It's in "scribblings/main/private" in the "racket-index" package:
>
> https://github.com/plt/racket
At Sat, 08 Aug 2015 16:19:23 +0100, Paulo Matos wrote:
> Where can I find the code for :
> http://docs.racket-lang.org/search/index.html
It's in "scribblings/main/private" in the "racket-index" package:
https://github.com/plt/racket/tree/master/pkgs/racket-index/scribblings/main/private
--
You
Hi,
Where can I find the code for :
http://docs.racket-lang.org/search/index.html
I would like to repurpose the engine that does this kind of search and
display it.
Could you please point me to the sources for it?
Thanks,
--
Paulo Matos
--
You received this message because you are subscrib
I can't think of an alternative to explicit state for this problem.
Probably we agree that your attempt didn't really "avoid mutation". It
was using mutation that's already present and exposed --- which is
often a good alternative to introducing more mutation, but maybe it
doesn't help much here,
The problem here is the same as in
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/racket-users/H7vilh3KcD4/pGZif3F3dEkJ
I still haven't thought about it enough to fine better solution than
putting `require (only-in racket/base #%module-begin))` before the
submodule declaration.
At Thu, 30 Jul 2015 16:46:34 +0
At Mon, 3 Aug 2015 14:02:50 -0700, Ryan Davis wrote:
> > On Jul 29, 2015, at 08:16, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> >
> > We're preparing a v6.2.1 release, which will go out before August 10.
> > The v6.2.1 build will be a small set of patches to v6.2, i.e., not
> > derived from the current development br
I fixed the minor issue, but I haven't been able to figure out how
`send-new-place-channel-to-named-dest` is meant to work, either. (I'll
try again to contact Kevin.)
At Thu, 6 Aug 2015 11:32:29 +0100, Tim Brown wrote:
> On 06/08/15 11:29, Tim Brown wrote:
> > (define node (create-place-node "lo
I think that's the only safe way to make a thread keep running outside
the custodian that will be killed.
If starting a program under another custodian is too much of a hassle,
you could access the root custodian via the FFI and create a thread
owned by it. See the implementation of `register-fina
Michael Titke wrote on 08/08/2015 02:40 AM:
Top-down A and Right-to-Left E, right? I'm not able to find the code
points for these symbols right now ...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_logic_symbols
BTW, if someone's looking for a fun little summer vacation #lang
learning exercise, you
9 matches
Mail list logo
