Re: [racket-users] Miscellaneous bugs/feature requests

> On Nov 20, 2015, at 5:43 AM, Josh Grams wrote: > > On 2015-11-17 11:04AM, Matthias Felleisen wrote: >> On Nov 16, 2015, at 8:11 PM, Josh Grams wrote: >> >>> - big-bang: seems to stop sending "leave" events after a while (Windows >>> 7, 64 bit Racket

Re: [racket-users] Rust vs. C as a complement to Racket?

On Friday, November 20, 2015 at 5:40:32 AM UTC-5, Hendrik Boom wrote: > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 02:01:02PM -0800, Brian Adkins wrote: > > The more I dig into Racket, the more I like it. It seems like a perfect fit > > for both my personality and the type of applications I am, and will be, > >

[racket-users] Re: [racket] PLT_HTTP_PROXY and PLT_NO_PROXY honoured (#1089)

Matt, (n.b. the message on GitHub is a bcc: of one I've sent to racket users) Sorry, I got diverted to other more “urgent” things (he who pays the piper...). That's why I took so long finishing the job; and rushing at the end, why I left garbage like net/url-proxy in the commit. So THANK

Re: [racket-users] Miscellaneous bugs/feature requests

On 2015-11-17 11:04AM, Matthias Felleisen wrote: >On Nov 16, 2015, at 8:11 PM, Josh Grams wrote: > >> - big-bang: seems to stop sending "leave" events after a while (Windows >> 7, 64 bit Racket 6.2.1). > >I can't replicate but this sounds like something that we should figure

Re: [racket-users] Miscellaneous bugs/feature requests

On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 4:38 AM, Josh Grams wrote: > On 2015-11-17 06:43AM, Robby Findler wrote: >>On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Josh Grams wrote: >>> - DrRacket: is there some way to set a key binding to rename a *variable*? >> >>c:x;m under mac os x. You

Re: [racket-users] Miscellaneous bugs/feature requests

On 2015-11-17 06:43AM, Robby Findler wrote: >On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Josh Grams wrote: >> - DrRacket: is there some way to set a key binding to rename a *variable*? > >c:x;m under mac os x. You may need to disable menu bindings for that >to work under windows, tho. Ah,

Re: [racket-users] Rust vs. C as a complement to Racket?

On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 02:01:02PM -0800, Brian Adkins wrote: > The more I dig into Racket, the more I like it. It seems like a perfect fit > for both my personality and the type of applications I am, and will be, > writing. For the vast majority of what I need to do, it's a great fit. > > I do

Re: [racket-users] Typed Racket and struct

Hi, On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 8:29 PM, Asumu Takikawa wrote: > On 2015-11-19 09:11:08 +, Antonio Menezes Leitao wrote: > >So, my questions are: > >1. Are there any plans to support #:constructor-name in Typed Racket? > > I haven't tried to implement support for it,

Re: [racket-users] Typed Racket and struct

Hi, On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 1:59 AM, WarGrey Gyoudmon Ju wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 3:27 AM, Antonio Menezes Leitao < > antonio.menezes.lei...@ist.utl.pt> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 11:36 AM, WarGrey Gyoudmon Ju < >> juzhenli...@gmail.com>

Re: [racket-users] start to contribute to racket

Hi Sagar, and welcome to Racket. If you're looking for project ideas, you may be interested in this list of intro projects: https://github.com/racket/racket/wiki/Intro-Projects Some of those are libraries you could write, others are small standalone programs, and others still are small

[racket-users] start to contribute to racket

I started racket before six month. After knowing some part I want to do some useful thing in racket. Anyone Please help me. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send

[racket-users] (syntax-local-make-definition-context intdef-ctx) inexplicably sheds bindings

I have a code that looks like this: (emit-local-step #'func.name (internal-definition-context-apply/loc defs #'func.name) #:id #'defun) (let ([defs (syntax-local-make-definition-context defs)] [ctx (build-expand-context ctx)] [args (parse-arg-names #'func.args)])

Re: [racket-users] Typed Racket and struct

On 2015-11-20 16:02:32 +, Antonio Menezes Leitao wrote: >That would be great! >I don't mind testing it on a snapshot build. I created an issue for it on the TR repo so you can follow that for progress: https://github.com/racket/typed-racket/issues/253 Cheers, Asumu -- You