[racket-users] Places performance & channel capacity

My initial experiment with places is a bit disappointing: Sequential version: cpu time: 2084 real time: 2091 gc time: 91 Places version: cpu time: 16895 real time: 3988 gc time: 4244 Using 8x the CPU time seems quite high. And more importantly, the places version only wrote 128,541 lines to

[racket-users] Re: Places performance & channel capacity

On Wednesday, January 20, 2016 at 11:28:59 PM UTC-5, Brian Adkins wrote: > My initial experiment with places is a bit disappointing: > > Sequential version: cpu time: 2084 real time: 2091 gc time: 91 > > Places version: cpu time: 16895 real time: 3988 gc time: 4244 > > Using 8x the CPU time

Re: [racket-users] Abridged summary of racket-users@googlegroups.com - 16 updates in 7 topics

is it possible to create a 'os' using 'racket' On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:57 PM, wrote: > racket-users@googlegroups.com > > Google > Groups >

[racket-users] defproc duplicate argumnt

I have: @defproc[(fmt (format (or/c string? fmt?)) ... (port (or/c output-port? 'string 'str 'current 'cur 'argument 'arg) 'string) (and/c procedure? fmt?)]{bla bla bla} in a scrbl file, where 'bla bla

Re: [racket-users] Using the web server without continuations?

You can have a send/suspend that uses Racket's continuation in any piece of the code with no special handling. If you want to use `#lang web-server`'s continuations, then the code in the continuation needs to be written in `#lang web-server`, unless you mark the portion not written in `#lang