On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 12:35 AM, Matthew Butterick wrote:
> The docs say `eqv?` differs from `eq?` only for nmbers and characters. But
> is this still true since numbers and characters became interned data types
> in 2011? [1]
>
That mail thread is specifically about *literal*
The docs say `eqv?` differs from `eq?` only for nmbers and characters. But is
this still true since numbers and characters became interned data types in
2011? [1]
If it were true I would've expected the docs to say so; OTOH the docs do not
provide an example of, say, a pair of numbers where
Seems to have been some intermittent failure, it works now.
//Niklas
On Sunday, July 24, 2016 at 4:10:19 PM UTC+2, metaniklas wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I installed Racket 6.6. In DrRacket I can't type '\' (or the graphic lambda)
> which is an AltGr combination on a Swedish keyboard (AltGr-+). All
Hi, Greg.
I'm not sure how to elegantly keep it backward compatible.
The best thing I could come up with since yesterday would be to create
new functions for the new version, by adding a parameter to defraw.
(See below.) Do you or does anyone have a good idea?
(defraw put-item
Hi!
I installed Racket 6.6. In DrRacket I can't type '\' (or the graphic lambda)
which is an AltGr combination on a Swedish keyboard (AltGr-+). All other AltGr
chars (brackets etc) works fine.
I have a vague memory of this occurring in some version long ago and then being
fixed.
Cheers,
5 matches
Mail list logo