Thank you for the suggestions. I've tried to do the following to test your
guess:
-deleted everything except the source files
-raco exe app.rkt
-raco exe eng.rkt
(app is the web app, eng the program I use to create the files with the
serialized data, words contains the serializable-struct and
I see, I've tried `raco demod` and I am pretty happy with it.
Thanks for answering.
On Sunday, August 14, 2016 at 3:31:01 PM UTC+2, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> Restricting imports in that way is unlikely to reduce memory
> consumption. A module will be loaded if it is transitively required
> from the
Restricting imports in that way is unlikely to reduce memory
consumption. A module will be loaded if it is transitively required
from the program's main module, whether or not any of its definitions
are used.
The `raco demod` tool can flatten some programs into a single module
and discard unused
To a first approximation, Racket places have that same property:
different places do not share mutable data, so each place has its own
GC.
More precisely, there is a shared space that is used to set up
communication, but GCs there are rare and triggered only by creating
new place channels.
Thanks for the book, I've read the first and started the second edition
recently. It is great.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
Hi, I use `(require (only-in aModule aFunction anotherFunction))` a lot to make
use of modules safer, but it also can lead to reduced memory consumption not
loading the module on its entirety? Or this is not the case?
What tools I can use to evaluate this myself on the linux platform?
Thanks in
6 matches
Mail list logo
