On Saturday, November 12, 2016 at 6:34:00 PM UTC-5, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
> > On Nov 12, 2016, at 4:46 PM, Charles Parker wrote:
> >
> > Reading "Realm of Racket" and trying the Snake Game exercise. Where can I
> > find the graphics for use in my program?
> >
> > Thanx ... Charlie
>
>
>
Sigh. Sorry -- setting the current-directory in the file with the code for the
remote place does _not_ get reflected in the subsequent file that is required.
It seems that I need to set the current-directory everywhere that the path
matters.
Is this what I should expect or is there a problem?
> On Nov 12, 2016, at 4:46 PM, Charles Parker wrote:
>
> Reading "Realm of Racket" and trying the Snake Game exercise. Where can I
> find the graphics for use in my program?
>
> Thanx ... Charlie
It’s advertised in the book as collects/realm/chapter6 (I believe, no copy
handy)
If you ha
On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Alex Knauth wrote:
>
> > On Nov 12, 2016, at 4:22 PM, David Storrs
> wrote:
> >
> > The 'thunk' procedure is really useful and is sprinkled liberally
> through my code because it saves keystrokes / is clearer than (lambda ()
> ...). I often find myself writing (
> On Nov 12, 2016, at 4:22 PM, David Storrs wrote:
>
> The 'thunk' procedure is really useful and is sprinkled liberally through my
> code because it saves keystrokes / is clearer than (lambda () ...). I often
> find myself writing (lambda (x) ...) for something and wishing that there was
>
Your quastion is not clear to me but may be you want --thunk*--?
Jos
_
From: racket-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:racket-users@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of David Storrs
Sent: sábado, 12 de noviembre de 2016 22:23
To: Racket Users
Subject: [racket-users] If a thunk is a proc of zero ar
Reading "Realm of Racket" and trying the Snake Game exercise. Where can I find
the graphics for use in my program?
Thanx ... Charlie
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
The 'thunk' procedure is really useful and is sprinkled liberally through
my code because it saves keystrokes / is clearer than (lambda () ...). I
often find myself writing (lambda (x) ...) for something and wishing that
there was an equivalent of 'thunk' for that.
Is there? If not, what would b
So I've confirmed that if I include a (current-directory "proper-path") in the
file containing the supervised place at the remote node, then the subsequent
file that is required by the supervised place file does indeed inherit the
proper-path.
As a wild guess, maybe this has something to do wit
Thanks!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
10 matches
Mail list logo