> Does anybody have an implementation of the Mann-Whitney U test (or the
> equivalent Wilcoxson Rank test) in Racket? I imagine I could easily hack up
> my own, but somebody else may have done a better job of it already.
I see that no one has answered this question yet. This is something whic
> On Jan 21, 2017, at 6:27 PM, Dupéron Georges
> wrote:
>
> I was going to suggest `dynamic-require-for-syntax`, but it seems to do
> exactly the same thing as `dynamic-require`, i.e. give the value of a phase-0
> provided identifier. Is this normal?
>
> The `eval` trick is a good idea, I wo
So I went looking for Matthew’s classic 2011 post on ‘eval’, today, and my
friendly local search engine returned this link:
https://blog.racket-lang.org/2011/10/on-eval-in-dynamic-languages-generally.html
… which is now a 403 Forbidden.
After some searching, I figured out that the correct link
Deserialization appears to be broken for class-based objects that implement
interfaces with contracted methods.
Given this example module:
#lang racket
(require racket/class
racket/serialize)
(define foo<%>
(interface ()
[foo-method (->m any/c)]))
(define-serializable-class* foo% o
I was going to suggest `dynamic-require-for-syntax`, but it seems to do exactly
the same thing as `dynamic-require`, i.e. give the value of a phase-0 provided
identifier. Is this normal?
The `eval` trick is a good idea, I would say. From the couple of times I have
used dynamic-require, I have f
Thanks, Dupéron, that's helpful.
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 8:35 PM, Dupéron Georges
wrote:
> Le vendredi 20 janvier 2017 19:47:11 UTC+1, David K. Storrs a écrit :
>> I see that I can get the event telling me that something changed. As
>> far as I can tell the event contains no information about *w
6 matches
Mail list logo